[00:04:28] OKAY. GOOD AFTERNOON EVERYONE. TODAY IS DECEMBER 17TH. IT IS 5:30 P.M. AND I'D LIKE TO CALL OUR ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS MEETING TO ORDER. STAFF, CAN YOU PLEASE CONFIRM THAT WE HAVE A QUORUM? YES, SIR. MR. CHAIRMAN, WE DO HAVE A QUORUM WITH VOTING. I'M SORRY, WITH BOARD MEMBERS, MR. OMAR, MR. DUSTIN GARZA, VICE CHAIRMAN GARZA. MR. CHAIRMAN MICHAEL CANTU, BOARD MEMBER MARK GONZALEZ, BOARD MEMBER MATTHEW CRUZ AND BOARD MEMBER MR. TONY [1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER, ESTABLISH QUORUM] GARZA. THANK YOU. CAN EVERYONE PLEASE STAND AND JOIN ME IN PRAYER? LET US PRAY. HEAVENLY [00:05:02] FATHER, WE COME TO YOU TODAY ASKING FOR YOUR GUIDANCE, WISDOM AND SUPPORT AS WE BEGIN TODAY'S MEETING, HELP US TO ENGAGE IN MEANINGFUL DISCUSSION. ALLOW US TO GROW CLOSER AS A [A. Prayer] GROUP AND NURTURE THE BONDS OF COMMUNITY. FILL US WITH YOUR GRACE, LORD GOD, AS WE MAKE DECISIONS THAT MIGHT AFFECT OUR CITY AND CONTINUE TO REMIND US THAT WE THAT ALL WE DO HERE TODAY, ALL THAT WE ACCOMPLISH, IS FOR THE BETTERMENT OF OUR CITY. WE ASK THESE THINGS IN YOUR NAME. AMEN. MR. GARZA, CAN YOU LEAD US IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE? ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS? ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. THANK YOU. EVERYBODY CAN BE [B. Pledge of Allegiance] SEATED. CERTIFICATION OF PUBLIC NOTICE. YES, SIR. MR. CHAIRMAN, STAFF DID NOTIFY THE PUBLIC. AS FOR THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT ON THE 10TH OF DECEMBER AT 5 P.M. THANK YOU. DISCLOSURE OF [2. CERTIFICATION OF PUBLIC NOTICE] CONFLICT OF INTEREST. MR. CHAIRMAN, UNDER STATE LAW, A LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL IS REQUIRED TO DISCLOSE A SUBSTANTIAL INTEREST FOR THEMSELVES OR CERTAIN FAMILY MEMBERS AND ABSTAIN FROM VOTING ON MATTERS RELATED TO SUCH CONFLICT. ARE THERE ANY CONFLICTS TO DISCLOSE RELATED TO THE PENDING MATTERS ON TODAY'S AGENDA? NO, SIR. THANK [3. DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST] YOU. ITEM FOUR PUBLIC COMMENTS. PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES. IF A RESIDENT DESIRES TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT, PLEASE NOTIFY THE CHAIRPERSON PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. A SPOKESPERSON FOR LARGE GROUPS IS REQUIRED. WE ASK FOR EVERYONE'S [4. PUBLIC COMMENTS] COOPERATION AND FOLLOWING THESE PROCEDURES. IS ANYONE HERE TO MAKE PUBLIC COMMENTS? MOVING ON TO ITEM FIVE. THE FOLLOWING ARE THE MEETING PROCEDURES USED BY THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS. ITEM A ALL ITEMS ARE GENERALLY CONSIDERED AS THEY APPEAR ON THE AGENDA. AS EACH ITEM IS [5. THE FOLLOWING ARE THE MEETING PROCEDURES USED BY THE ZONING] INTRODUCED, STAFF WILL PRESENT ITS FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION ON THE ITEM BEING CONSIDERED. [A. All items are generally considered as they appear on the agenda as each item is introduced.] THE PARTY MAKING THE REQUEST MAY MAKE A PRESENTATION AND MAY ADDRESS THE BOARD ON ANY ISSUES ARISING DURING THE DISCUSSION OF THE ITEM BEING CONSIDERED. ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE DESIRING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OR IN OPPOSITION MAY DO SO. A THREE MINUTE TIME LIMIT WILL BE GIVEN TO EACH PERSON INTERESTED IN SPEAKING ON THE ITEM. THE USE OF A SPOKESPERSON FOR LARGE GROUPS OF PEOPLE WILL BE REQUIRED. ONCE THE CHAIR CLOSES THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE BOARD MAY QUESTION ANYONE AND MAINTAIN ANY DISCUSSION WHICH CLARIFIES THE PROPOSAL AND WILL THEN TAKE WHAT ACTION IT BELIEVES TO BE APPROPRIATE. A MINIMUM OF FOUR VOTES ARE REQUIRED FOR AN ITEM TO BE APPROVED BY THE BOARD. ITEM SIX MINUTES ITEM A CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE OCTOBER 29TH, 2025 REGULAR MEETING. IS THERE A MOTION? I HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL? IS IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION PASSES. ITEM SIX. BE. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FROM THE NOVEMBER 19TH, 2025 REGULAR MEETING. CAN I HAVE A MOTION? MOTION FOR APPROVAL? APPROVAL FROM MR. GONZALEZ? I SECOND THE MOTION SECOND FROM MR. GARZA. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION PASSES. [6. MINUTES] [B. Consider Approval of the Minutes from the November 19, 2025, regular meeting.] MOVING ON TO ITEM SEVEN. PUBLIC HEARINGS SEVEN A VARIANCE REQUEST BY JOSE AND ESTELA GARZA FOR A VARIANCE TO THE CITY OF EDINBURGH UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW [7. PUBLIC HEARINGS] EXISTING STRUCTURE TO EXCEED MAXIMUM CARPORT SIZE OF 400FT■!S FOR MANUFACTURED HOMES, BEING LOT 22 MONTE CRISTO RECREATIONAL VEHICLE COMMUNITY SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 3717 MERCEDES DRIVE. JC. PLANNING AND ZONING. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTH OF MERCEDES DRIVE, AT AROUND 350FT WEST OF NORTH CANYON ROAD. THE PROPERTY IS PART OF MONTE CRISTO RECREATIONAL VEHICLE COMMUNITY SUBDIVISION THAT WAS RECORDED ON JANUARY 28TH, 1985. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO ALLOW FOR AN EXISTING STRUCTURE, A CARPORT THAT EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM SIZE OF 400FT THAT IT'S ALLOWED FOR MANUFACTURED HOMES. STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL FOR THE [A. Variance Request by Jose & Estella Garza for a Variance to the City of Edinburg Unified] VARIANCE. IF APPROVED, THE APPLICANT WILL ALSO NEED TO COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS DURING THE PERMIT PROCESS, STAFF MAILED A 77 NEIGHBORHOODS. WE GOT 13 IN FAVOR. RESPONSES. THANK YOU. I WILL NOW OPEN THIS ITEM FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE OR IS THE APPLICANT HERE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THIS ITEM? PLEASE COME ON UP SIR. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD JOSE LUIS GARCIA. YES, SIR. YEAH, I DID THE CARPORT FROM RV UNDER [00:10:05] THE CARPORT FOR THE WEATHER AND STUFF. I DIDN'T KNOW WE NEEDED A PERMIT SINCE WE'RE UNDER HOA AND THROUGH THE PARK. THEY SAID IT WAS FINE WITH THAT. THEY GAVE ME THE DIMENSIONS THAT I COULD DO IT AND STUFF. SO I MADE THAT BIG FOR RV PARKING. OKAY. IS THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? MR. GARCIA, DO YOU HAVE THE FORM OR THE LETTER FROM THE HOA? YES, I HAVE HAROLD. YES, I HAVE TALKED TO ROSS AND TOM, BUT THE GUY THAT TAKES CARE OF THE ARCHITECTURE, HE PASSED AWAY IN THOSE DAYS THAT THAT I WAS DOING. BUT HE GAVE ME AN OKAY FOR IT TO DO IT. OKAY. YES. OKAY, OKAY. STAFF, WHAT WAS THE RESPONSE AGAIN FROM THE FROM THE COMMUNITY. THOSE PEOPLE THAT WERE IT WAS 13 PEOPLE IN FAVOR. I PUT THE LETTERS ON THE 13 PEOPLE IN FAVOR SEVEN, EIGHT. SO THAT WAS PRETTY OVERWHELMING. YES. AND ALSO I NOTICED THAT IT SAYS ON HERE THAT THERE'S OTHER SIMILAR CARPORTS IN THE IN THE SAME SUBJECT. YES. THAT'S CORRECT. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU CAN SEE THE AERIAL. MOST OF THE PROPERTIES HAVE SIMILAR DIMENSIONS FOR THE FOR THE CARPORTS. SOME OF THEM ARE PRETTY OLD. THEY DON'T EVEN ASK FOR FOR PERMITS, BUT MOST OF THE AREA, THEY HAVE SIMILAR DIMENSIONS. SINCE THEY PUT THE RV INSIDE OF THE OF THE CARPORT. AND ON THE SETBACKS, EVERYTHING KIND OF MATCHES WITH WHAT'S ALREADY THERE. YES, IN THAT AREA ON THE SIDE, THE SUBDIVISION HAS LIKE TWO FEET OF OF SETBACK FROM THE NEIGHBORS. SO MOST OF THEM HAVE THAT AS WELL. THANK YOU. OKAY. THIS IS ONE OF THE ITEMS OR SITUATIONS WHERE IT ACTUALLY CONFORMS TO TO WHAT'S HAPPENING IN IN THE COMMUNITY. YEAH. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE IN THE PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A COMMENT? YES, SIR. COME ON UP. HI, MY NAME'S DARYL SEAMAN AND I'M ON THE BOARD. IT'S ACTUALLY A POA PROPERTY OWNERS AND MR. GARZA'S CARPORT OR WHATEVER YOU WANT TO CALL IT. STRUCTURE IS MORE COMPLIABLE THAN ANYBODY ELSE'S. ALL RIGHT. WHAT? IT WAS ONE PERSON WANTED THE TRASH, PROBABLY FROM WHAT WAS LEFT OVER. AND YOU SAID NO, AND HE GOT MAD. AND HERE WE ARE. OKAY. OKAY, SO THERE'S SOME THAT ARE LIKE A FOOT FROM THE STREET THAT HAVE BEEN THERE FOR YOU. JUST DO IT. AND I DON'T KNOW. BUT HE DID HAVE PERMISSION TO BUILD IT. AND WE WANTED THE CITY TO TAKE THE PARK OVER BEFORE. AND BECAUSE THE ROADS WERE NOT WIDE ENOUGH OR THE INFRASTRUCTURE WAS OLDER, CITY DIDN'T WANT TO HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. BUT NOW WITH THIS, HERE WE ARE. THAT'S ALL. PROBABLY SORRY FOR YOU GUYS ARE BUSY. THAT'S ALL I GOT TO SAY, SIR. THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS. I HAVE A QUESTION. OH YES, SIR. SO TYPICALLY POA OR HOA WILL ASK THE RESIDENT TO GET APPROVAL FROM THE CITY TO HAVE THESE TYPE OF STRUCTURES PERMITTED. IS THAT SOMETHING THAT YOU WILL ASK YOUR RESIDENTS? WELL, IT'S GOING TO BE WELL NOTIFIED. AND ON OUR BULLETIN BOARD OR WHATEVER. BUT THE PROBLEM IS I'M A WINTER TEXAN. SO AND ON OUR BOARD IS ALL WINTER TEXAS EXCEPT ONE PERSON. SO IN SIX MONTHS THERE'S NOTHING REALLY SUPPOSED TO HAPPEN IN A CLUBHOUSE IS LOCKED AND ALL OF THAT STUFF. SO I UNDERSTAND. I THINK THAT'S JUST SOMETHING TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION TO MAKE SURE TO NOTIFY ALL YOUR RESIDENTS THAT I'M PRETTY SURE AFTER THIS INCIDENT, EVERYBODY WILL BE COMPLYING WITH THE BUILDING PERMIT. YES. MR. GARZA HAS ALREADY PAID OVER $450 IN FINES AND PENALTIES AND HAS HAD A MEDICAL ISSUE. THAT STRESS IS NOT GOOD. SO WE'RE HOPING TODAY WE CAN MOVE ON. YES. SO TO AVOID THAT, I THINK IT WOULD JUST BE BEST IF RESIDENTS ARE NOTIFIED THAT BEFORE THEY COMMENCE A PROJECT OR ANY TYPE OF STRUCTURE TO COME TO THE CITY FIRST TO OBVIOUSLY GET APPROVAL AND PERMIT. YEAH, GET A PERMIT FOR SURE. THANK YOU. I AGREE. WE'RE GOOD. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU SIR. IS THERE ANY MORE COMMENTS? HAROLD MORGAN I LIVE ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE STRUCTURE. I'M PROBABLY THE ONLY ONE IN THE PARK EYE VIEW OA VERY NICE STRUCTURE. ONE OF THE NICEST. DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT AT ALL. THANK YOU. EXCELLENT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENT, SIR. ANY MORE COMMENTS? ANY MORE QUESTIONS? [00:15:07] THEN I'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE COMMENT SECTION ON THIS ITEM, AND I'LL ASK THE BOARD FOR A MOTION. INCLUDED IN THE MOTION TO APPROVE IT. I HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL FOR MR. SECOND, FOR MR. GONZALEZ. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION PASSES. MOVING ON TO ITEM SEVEN. THE. VARIANCE REQUEST BY CARMEN DE LA FUENTE FOR A VARIANCE TO THE CITY OF EDINBURGH UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW A [B. Variance Request by Carmen D. De La Fuente for a Variance to the City of Edinburg Unified] ZERO FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR CARPORT BEING LOT ONE, BLOCK 343 EDINBURG. ORIGINAL TOWN SITE HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS LOCATED AT 222 WEST FIFTH STREET. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON SOUTH OF WEST FE STREET, APPROXIMATELY 300FT WEST OF SOUTH 10TH AVENUE. THE PROPERTY IS PART OF THE EDINBURG ORIGINAL TOWNHOMES, AND IT'S ZONED AS RESIDENTIAL PRIMARY AS WELL AS THE SURROUNDING AREA. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO ALLOW FOR THE EXISTING CARPORT TO HAVE A ZERO FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. THE. THE STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL FOR THE VARIANCE REQUEST. IF APPROVED, THE APPLICANT WILL ALSO NEED TO COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER REQUIREMENTS DURING THE PERMIT PROCESS. THE APPLICANT HAS. SORRY. STAFF HAS MAILED 42 MAILS TO THE RESIDENTS. WE HAD ONE IN FAVOR FROM THE NEIGHBOR NEXT TO THE PROPERTY LINE THAT THE CARPORT WAS BUILT, ONE WITHOUT NO COMMENTS AND ONE AGAINST AMANDA MAILS WERE PASSED OUT FOR YOU GUYS. THANK YOU. I'LL NOW OPEN THE ITEM FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS. IS THE APPLICANT HERE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THE THE THE ITEM? GOOD EVENING. GOOD EVENING. CAN YOU STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD? YES, MY NAME IS CARMEN DE LA FUENTE AND I'VE BEEN A RESIDENT FOR 80 YEARS. AND I BUILT THE CARPORT BECAUSE IT'S A NECESSITY. IT'S NEEDED FOR THE HARSH SUN FOR TO PROTECT THE VEHICLE. AND THAT IS THE REASON. THANK YOU, MR. LA FUENTE. YOU'RE WELCOME. I HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF. WHAT IS THE CARPORT MADE OUT OF? YES, THE CARPORT IS MADE OUT OF METAL. OKAY. IS IT ENTIRELY MADE OUT OF METAL? YES. OKAY. AND YOU MENTIONED THAT THE NEIGHBOR SUBMITTED A RESPONSE AND WAS IN FAVOR OF THE APPLICATION. IT'S THE ONE THAT LOOKS LIKE A MALE FEMALE. IT'S FROM MR. RICHARD MOLINA. HE'S THE NEIGHBORHOOD NEXT TO THE PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO THE CARPET. OKAY. IS THERE DO YOU KNOW OF IN THE SAME NEIGHBORHOOD? IS THERE AN HOA IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD? NO, THAT I'M AWARE OF. OKAY. AND. OKAY, I SEE THE, THE THE EXHIBIT WHERE IT SHOWS EXISTING CARPORT. SO THERE'S, THERE'S, THERE'S MANY IN THE SUBDIVISION. YES. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANY ONE ELSE IN THE PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A COMMENT? ANY MORE QUESTIONS, MR. CHAIR? GUYS QUESTION FOR FOR CITY STAFF. IT SEEMS TO ME SOMETIMES WE GET THESE CASES AT THESE MEETINGS, BUT THE PROJECT IS DONE. SO WHAT IS THE CITY DOING OR HAVE THERE BEEN THOUGHTS ABOUT KIND OF GETTING IN FRONT OF THE CITIZENS BEFORE THE PROJECTS ARE DONE, THEN BROUGHT TO US? MOST OF THESE PROJECTS ARE DONE IN CONCRETE, RIGHT? AND SO TO ASK THE CITIZEN TO REMOVE IT, TO DO SOMETHING, IT JUST MAKES OUR JOB A LITTLE HARDER. SO I'M JUST CURIOUS ON THOSE THOUGHTS FROM THE CITY. NORMALLY WHEN THE CARPET'S ALREADY DONE, BECAUSE IT'S CODE ENFORCEMENT, THE ONE DO THE CONTACT WITH THE WITH THE NEIGHBORS OR THE CITIZENS, SOMETIMES WITH THE CARPORT. THEY BUILD IT ONE DAY. MAYBE THEY DIDN'T NOTICE. I DON'T KNOW SPECIFICALLY HOW THEY WORK. IF THEY HAVE LIKE A ROUTE FOR THE CITY OR ANYTHING, BUT NORMALLY THEY GO MORE INTO THE WHO COMPLAINS THAT OLDER BUILDING SOMETHING AND THEY STEP IN. SO NORMALLY MOST OF THE CASES STRUCTURES ALREADY BUILT. SO. MR. LA PUENTE, WHEN [00:20:06] WAS THE CARPORT BUILT? IT WAS BUILT NOVEMBER 9TH. OF THIS YEAR. YES. ANY MORE QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? IF NOT, I'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENT SECTION ON THIS ITEM AND I'LL ASK THE BOARD FOR A MOTION. A MOTION TO APPROVE ALSO HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL FOR MR. GARZA AND HAVE A SECOND AS WELL. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION PASSES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. MOVING ON TO ITEM SEVEN C VARIANCE. NO I'M SORRY. WAIT. ARE WE ON 17. YES OKAY. VARIANCE REQUEST BY CARMEN DE LA PUENTE. THIS TIME IT'S FOR THE APPLICANT. THAT'S THE ITEM. BUT NAME. IT'S OKAY. VARIANCE [C. Variance Request by Roy Luna for a Variance to the City of Edinburg Unified Development] REQUEST BY ROY LUNA FOR A VARIANCE TO THE CITY OF EDINBURGH UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW THE REDUCTION OF A SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 30FT TO 25FT ALONG WEST PROPERTY LINE AND 21FT EIGHT INCHES ALONG EAST PROPERTY LINE, BEING 2.768 ACRES. ACRE TRACT OUT OF A 4.984 ACRE TRACT OUT OF THE EAST ONE HALF OF LOT 15, SECTION 233 TEXAS MEXICAN RAILWAY COMPANY SURVEY CITY OF EDINBURGH, HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS, LOCATED AT 5501 WEST JUNIOR STREET, SO THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 600FT NORTH OF WEST JUNIOR STREET AND AROUND 850FT EAST OF NORTH DEPOT ROAD. THE PROPERTY HAS NOT BEEN SUBDIVIDED. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REDUCE THE SETBACKS FROM 30FT ON THE SIDE YARD SETBACK TO ONE SIDE OF 25FT ALONG WEST PROPERTY LINE AND 21FT EIGHT INCHES ALONG EAST PROPERTY LINE. THE STAFF RECOMMENDS FOR THE VARIANCE REQUEST. IF APPROVED, THE APPLICANT WILL ALSO NEED TO COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER REQUIREMENTS DURING THE PERMIT PROCESS. STAFF MAILED 19 NEIGHBORS OF THE PROPERTY. NO RESPONSE AT THE TIME OF THE REPORT. THANK YOU. I'LL NOW OPEN THE PUBLIC PUBLIC COMMENT SECTION ON THIS ITEM. IS THE APPLICANT HERE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THE ITEM? GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS AMADO, HERE REPRESENTING ROY LUNA. I WILL BE THE PERSON WANTING TO BUILD ON THAT PROPERTY. THE REASON FOR THIS REQUEST IS BECAUSE I WAS NOT INFORMED THAT IT'S MY MISTAKE. THAT'S MY NEGLIGENCE. I WAS UNAWARE OF THE SETBACKS FOR A AGRICULTURAL AGRICULTURE SETBACKS. WE DID GET A VARIANCE TO NOT HAVE TO SUBDIVIDE. WE DID GET APPROVAL FOR A FAMILY PARTITION HERE ON WHAT WAS MY MISTAKE IS I MADE A FLOOR PLAN, NOT TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION 30FT SETBACK ON EACH SIDE. MY MISTAKE. I THOUGHT IT WAS SIX FEET LIKE THE REST. I WAS UNAWARE OF THAT. AND MY THING IS WE ARE ENCROACHING A BIT. THE PROPERTY IS 165FT WIDE. THE HOUSE IS 118FT WIDE, SO I AM ENCROACHING 25FT ON ONE SIDE AND THEN 21FT ON THE OTHER SIDE. MY THING IS, I ALREADY HAVE MY FLOOR PLAN SET OUT TO THAT SPACE AND ASKING AS A FAVOR IF I COULD HAVE THAT VARIANCE APPROVED, WOULD YOU BREAK GROUND ALREADY? NO, SIR, I KNOW, I KNOW THAT MUCH. I DON'T THINK WE HAVE THE BACKUP TO THIS AGENDA ITEM. IT'S NOT ON THE. I THINK IT'S A DIFFERENT PROJECT. SO. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. I THINK THAT'S WHY YOU GOT CONFUSED. YEAH. IT'S HERE. THE ONLY THING THAT I'M SHOWING THE FRONT PAGE AS THE REQUEST FOR FROM CARMEN DE LA PUENTE. BUT IT'S THE GENTLEMAN'S REQUEST WITH WITH THE DOCUMENTATION IN THE BACK. YEAH, THE ITEM IS THE SEVEN C. THE ONLY THING IS THAT THE NAME OF THE REPORT WAS MESSED UP FROM THE PREVIOUS ONE. OKAY. SO IT'S IN SEVEN C. YEAH. OKAY. YOU PROVIDED A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY AND THE SITE PLAN THAT IT'S SHOWING ON THE SCREEN FOR THE HOUSE. I HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF. SO YOU DENIAL YOU'RE REQUESTING DENIAL. WHAT'S THE REASON BEHIND THIS. JUST BECAUSE OF THE ZONING. BECAUSE HE COULD JUST REZONE THE PROPERTY. BUT HE MADE THE COMMENT THAT HE WANTS TO HAVE SOME ANIMALS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. SO WE'LL CONTINUE TO FARM IT. IT IS A LARGE PROPERTY, IF [00:25:05] I MAY. MY FATHER IN LAW IS GIFTING THAT TO MY WIFE AND I. IT IS EVERYONE LIVES IN THAT AREA. SO WE WERE WE WERE STUCK WITH THE LOT, THE LAST OF IT AND WELL, THE WHOLE ENTIRE PLACE. WE DON'T NEED THAT MUCH ROOM, BUT JUST TO BE WITH THE FAMILY TOGETHER. IT'S APPROXIMATELY WHAT WAS IT, 2.87 ACRES OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. SO THE THING IS, WE DO WANT TO CONTINUE FARMING IT ALL AROUND IT FROM EAST AND WEST. IT DOES GET FARMED. SO ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, I WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE FARMING IT. THAT'S WHERE I WANT TO KEEP IT, AGRICULTURE. AND OBVIOUSLY IF I IF I MAY, I'D LIKE TO HAVE A COW OR SOMETHING. YEAH. SO YOUR SETBACKS CHANGE. WHEN YOU DID THE REZONING TO AGRICULTURE, THE SETBACKS DID NOT CHANGE I DID. THEY'RE ASKING FOR ME TO CHANGE IT FROM AGRICULTURE TO RESIDENTIAL. I WOULD LIKE TO KEEP IT AGRICULTURE SO I CAN CONTINUE TO FARM THE PROPERTY. NOW, THE THING IS, I WAS UNAWARE THAT IN AGRICULTURE SETBACKS, THEY CHANGE FROM 30FT INSTEAD OF A NORMAL RESIDENTIAL. I BELIEVE IT'S SIX FEET, SIX FEET, SIX FEET. SO THAT'S THAT'S AN ERROR ON MY END. I WAS UNAWARE OF THAT. AND YOUR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNER WENT BASED ON SIX FEET ON THE EDGES ON THE SIDES. OKAY. SO THAT'S WHY, AS YOU CAN SEE, I WAS LIKE, OKAY, I HAVE 25FT ON ONE SIDE, 21FT. I HAVE MORE THAN ENOUGH ROOM FOR THE SETBACKS. AND AND WITH EVERYTHING SAID AND DONE RIGHT NOW WITH YOUR SITE PLAN, HOW MUCH ARE YOU LEAVING ON THE SIDES OF EACH OF THE HOUSE ALREADY WITH YOUR 25 ON ONE SIDE AND THEN 21.8 ON THE OTHER SIDE? SO I'M FREE AND CLEAR. YES, I'M ENCROACHING FIVE FEET ON ONE SIDE AND APPROXIMATELY NINE ON THE OTHER. OKAY. AND THEN ON YOUR NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES THERE, THERE'S NOBODY, THERE'S NOBODY. THERE'S MORE RANCHETTES OR THEY'RE KIND OF LIKE, IT'S ALL FARM NOW. IT'S ALL FARMLAND. YES, SIR. OKAY. IT'S ALL FARM NOW. AND THEN THE MAIN ENTRANCE FROM THE PROPERTY TO GET THERE. I MEAN, IT'S ALREADY, YOU KNOW, THEY LIVE THERE IN THE FRONT, AS YOU CAN SEE IN THAT PICTURE. PERFECT. SO IT LOOKS LIKE THAT HOUSE IS. ARE YOU LINING UP WITH THAT HOUSE? IS IT IS IT ALSO PAST THE 30FT, THE EXISTING STRUCTURE. THAT'S THAT'S ON THE PROPERTY OR IT'S IT'S ACTUALLY ON THE PROPERTY IN FRONT OF IT. THE PROPERTY IN FRONT OF IT. OKAY. THEY THEY REZONE IT TO RESIDENTIAL. SO SETBACK 15. YEAH. IT COMPLIES OKAY. ANY ANY RESPONSES FROM THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. NO RESPONSES. IT'S ALL IT'S ALL MY IN-LAWS. IT'S LITERALLY ALL IN-LAWS THERE. ALL RIGHT. ARE THERE ANY MORE COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC? OKAY. ANY MORE QUESTIONS? MOTION TO APPROVE, MR. CHAIRMAN. OKAY. LET ME LET ME CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENT SECTION. WITH THAT. I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENT SECTION AND I'LL ASK THE BOARD FOR A MOTION. MR. GARZA, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. MOTION FOR I HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL. IS THERE A SECOND? HAVE A SECOND FOR MR. GARZA. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION PASSES. THANK YOU. THANK YOU ALL. MOVING ON TO ITEM SEVEN, VARIANCE REQUEST BY MELVIN AND HUNT FOR A VARIANCE TO THE CITY OF EDINBURGH UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW THE REDUCTION OF A SIDE YARD SET OF SIDE YARD SETBACKS [D. Variance Request by Melden & Hunt, Inc. for a Variance to the City of Edinburg Unified] FROM 6FT TO 5FT, BEING LOTS ONE THROUGH 69. SAPPHIRE AT LA SERNA. PHASE ONE SUBDIVISION, CITY OF EDINBURGH, HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS, LOCATED AT 4401 LA SERNA PARKWAY, THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ALONG EAST LA SIENNA PARKWAY AND AROUND 1500FT NORTH OF BURNS BOULEVARD. THE PROPERTY IS PART OF LA SAPPHIRE AT LA SERNA PHASE ONE SUBDIVISION AND WAS RECORDED ON DECEMBER 5TH, 2025. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REDUCE THE SITE SETBACK FROM SIX REQUIRED BY THE CODE TO FIVE FEET. A STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL VARIANCE REQUEST. IF APPROVED, THE APPLICANT WILL ALSO NEED TO COMPLY WITH ALL THE REQUIREMENTS DURING THE PERMIT PROCESS. STAFF MAIL NOTICE TO 29 NEIGHBORHOODS. NO REPLY AT THE MOMENT OF THE OF THE REPORT. THANK YOU. IS THE APPLICANT HERE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THE ITEM? AND WITH THAT, I'LL ALSO OPEN THE PUBLIC COMMENT SECTION. GOOD AFTERNOON. BOARD NORDLUND HUNT. SO WE RECENTLY RECORDED THIS SUBDIVISION AND THE ITEM TWO ITEMS LATER. WE HAD GONE THROUGH SOME SUBDIVISION VARIANCES FOR THE REAR SETBACK AND FOR SOME OTHER ITEMS ON THE SUBDIVISION DURING THE PROCESS. DURING THAT, WE HAD AN OVERSIGHT OF THE SITE SETBACK. THE DEVELOPERS, ESPERANZA HOMES AND ROADS. THEY ARE REQUESTING FIVE FOOT SETBACKS FOR THE THE ENTIRETY OF THE SUBDIVISION FOR THIS ONE, AND THE UPCOMING ITEM. THE MAIN REASON IS JUST THEIR DEVELOPMENT'S FALL IN LINE A LITTLE BIT MORE WITH LIKE THE TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENTS, WHICH THE TOWNHOME ZONING FOR DETACHED HOUSES DOES ALLOW. FIVE FOOT SETBACK. WE KEPT IT [00:30:03] RESIDENTIAL PRIMARILY FOR THE ZONING, JUST SO THAT THERE WOULDN'T BE ANY CONFUSION AMONG DEVELOPERS OR ANYTHING IN THE FUTURE THAT FOR TOWNHOME ZONING, FOR IT TO BE ATTACHED OR ANYTHING, ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES IS TO KEEP IT DETACHED. SO THAT WAS THE REASON FOR THE VARIANCES REQUEST THAT WE DID. AND THE REASON FOR THIS VARIANCE REQUEST IS JUST TO TO DOWNSIZE, GET THAT EXTRA FOOT ON ON EACH SIDE FOR THEM TO BE ABLE TO FIT THEIR FLOOR PLANS THAT THEY HAVE ALLOCATED FOR THIS SUBDIVISION FOR THE FUTURE ONCOMING PHASES. WE HAVE INCLUDED IT AS PART OF THE SUBDIVISION VARIANCES FOR PHASE TWO AND PHASE THREE, BUT FOR ALL TIMING AND EVERYTHING THAT WE NEEDED TO SUBMIT PERMITS, WE RECORDED THE SUBDIVISION WITH THE SIX FOOT EASEMENTS, SIX FOOT SETBACKS, AND WE'RE NOW REQUESTING THE TO GO DOWN TO FIVE FEET. THANK YOU MARLA. ARE THERE ANY MORE COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC? SO YOU GUYS, I HAVE A QUESTION. FIVE FEET ON EACH SIDE IS WHAT YOU'RE REQUESTING CORRECT. AND THEN KEEP THE SETBACKS AT 15 ON THE BACK, 20 IN THE BACK, 20 IN THE IN THE FRONT. AND WE REDUCED THE REAR FROM 20 TO 10. OH THAT WAS THE REQUEST THAT WE WE GOT THAT ONE APPROVED THROUGH PLANNING AND ZONING AND CITY COMMISSION. OKAY. AND SO NOW THE ONLY ITEM THAT WAS LEFT OUT WAS THE SIDE SETBACK. AWESOME. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU MARLA. ANY MORE QUESTIONS, COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC? IF NOT, I'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENT SECTION AND I'LL ASK THE BOARD FOR A MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVED. MOTION FOR APPROVAL. SECOND FROM MR. GARZA. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION PASSES. MOVING ON TO ITEM SEVEN E. ARE WE ON SEVEN E? YES. YEAH. OKAY. VARIANCE REQUEST BY CHRISTIE GUZMAN FOR A VARIANCE TO THE CITY OF EDINBURGH UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW AN [E. Variance Request by Cristy Guzman for a Variance to the City of Edinburg Unified] ENCLOSED CARPORT ENCROACHMENT ON A 25 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK AND A SIX FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK BEING LOT 47, LAS CRUCES SUBDIVISION, HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS. LOCATED AT 1336 DENVER STREET. GOOD AFTERNOON EVERYONE. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW AN ENCLOSED CARPORT OVER A 25FT FROM YARD SETBACK AND SIX FEET WITH SIDE SETBACK LOCATED IN THE FRONT YARD. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED 650FT EAST FROM THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH SUGAR ROAD AND DENVER STREET. CURRENT RESIDENTIAL PRIMARY DISTRICT. ADJACENT ZONING. CONSISTENT RESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ADDICTION TO THE NORTHEAST AND WEST. THE PROPERTY IS PART OF THE LAS CRUCES SUBDIVISION, RECORDED ON DECEMBER 13TH, 2002. THE APPLICANT BUILT THE CARPORT BACK IN 2019. ON SEPTEMBER 12TH, 2025, THE CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED A FIELD INSPECTION AT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THE PROPERTY OWNER WAS NOTIFIED THAT NO BUILDING PERMIT HAD BEEN ISSUED FOR THE STRUCTURE. THE APPLICANT SUBMITTED A BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION ON SEPTEMBER 19TH. DURING STAFF REVIEW, IT WAS CONCLUDED THAT THE CARPORT ENCROACHING TO THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD YARD SETBACK AND INTO THE WEST SIDE YARD SETBACK. STAFF MAILED A NOTICE OF THE VARIANCE REQUEST TO 46 PROPERTY OWNERS ON DECEMBER 5TH, AND RECEIVED TWO COMMENTS AGAINST THIS REQUEST. THE STRUCTURE IS 18FT WIDE BY 20FT LONG, AND IS LOCATED WITHIN THE FRONT YARD OF THE PROPERTY. THE CARPORT MAINTAINS ONLY ONE FOOT NINE INCHES OF SEPARATION FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE HAS A SPECIAL ALLOWANCE FOR A CORPUS ON RESIDENTIAL ZONING, TO ALLOW THE ENCROACHMENT OF CORPUS INTO THE FRONT SETBACK BY A MAXIMUM OF TEN FEET, INCLUDING THE OVERHANG. THE CARPORT EXISTS. THE MAXIMUM ENCROACHMENT PERMITTED BY THE CODE BY 13FT THREE INCHES. ALSO, THE CARPORT ENCROACHES THREE FEET FIVE INCHES INTO THE REQUIRED SIDE YARD SETBACK. THERE ARE NO UTILITY EASEMENTS RECORDED ALONG THE FRONT OF THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL OF THE VARIANCE REQUEST. IF APPROVED, THE APPLICANT WILL ALSO NEED TO COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER REQUIREMENTS THROUGH THE PERMITTING PROCESS. THANK YOU FOR AND I HAVE I HAVE A QUESTION. I'M NOTICING THAT THERE ONCE AGAIN THE PLAT. IT [00:35:02] HAS A LOT OF OTHER CARPORTS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD ALREADY. YES, SIR. AND ARE THEY IN THE SIMILAR? I IMAGINE THE SIMILAR SITUATION IS MORE THAN TEN CARPORTS BUILT WITHOUT A PERMIT. THEY WERE BUILT BETWEEN 2019 AND 2022. IT WAS THE DURING THE COVID. YEAH. WE'VE BEEN NOTICING A LOT OF THESE NEIGHBORHOODS TEND TO, YOU KNOW, FOLLOW SUIT WITH WHAT YOU'RE SEEING IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD. SO IT'S NOT THE ONLY ONE. THERE'S WHAT I'M GETTING AT. YEAH. AND I IMAGINE IT'S GOING TO BE OF A SIMILAR NATURE. THE OTHER CARPORTS OF THE WIDTH AND LENGTH, I DO SEE THAT IT'S SITTING A LITTLE BIT BACK. IT'S WHAT TEN FEET FROM. IS THAT WHAT I HEARD RIGHT FROM THE FROM THE CURB BACK. YEAH. FROM THE FRONT. IT'S LIKE 11FT FROM THE CURB. 11 CLEARS THE WALKWAYS AND EVERYTHING ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD. YEAH. OKAY. THANK YOU. ANNA. ONE OF THE THINGS I WANTED TO MENTION, PLANNING AND ZONING DIRECTOR, FOR THE RECORD, IS THAT THE GARAGE HAS SOME PANELS. IT COULD BE SEEN AS A SIDE RESTRICTION TO THE NEIGHBOR THAT HAS HER DRIVEWAY JUST NEXT DOOR. OKAY, SO MAYBE WE COULD IF APPROVED, MAYBE ONE OF THE CONDITIONS WOULD BE TO REMOVE AT LEAST THE FIRST ROW OF PANELS. OKAY. THANK YOU. MR. STAFF. WHEN WAS THIS BUILT? YOU SAID 2019, 2019. SO CODE ENFORCEMENT, CODE ENFORCEMENT SHOW UP THERE BECAUSE WE'RE COMPLAINING FROM THE NEIGHBOR. SO THE NEIGHBOR HAS OBSTRUCTION AND THE POSSIBILITY WHEN. SO BACKING UP FROM FROM THEIR DRIVEWAY OKAY. JUST STARTED COMPLAINING. SIX YEARS LATER I'M CONFUSED I DON'T KNOW IS WHAT I, I, I SPOKE WITH CODE ENFORCEMENT I THINK THE NEIGHBORS HERE. SO I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC COMMENT SECTION AND I'LL ASK THE APPLICANT TO COME OR ANYBODY THAT HAS ANY COMMENTS TO COME, COME, COME UP ON TO THE PODIUM AND, AND, AND STATE, THEIR STATE THEIR COMMENTS. I'M A NEIGHBOR. MY NAME IS LAURA SALINAS. THE THE CARPORT, THE CARPORT WAS NOT ENCLOSED. IT WAS OPEN. LITTLE BY LITTLE THEY STARTED CLOSING IT UP. BUT AS THEY STARTED CLOSING IT UP, THEY STARTED PARKING THEIR CARS FURTHER OUT INTO THE SIDEWALK, BLOCKING THE DRIVEWAY VIEW AND THE SIDEWALK VIEW. SO WE CAN'T SEE ANYTHING FROM THE ENCLOSURE. AND THEN THEY HAVE BIG TRUCKS SO WE CAN'T SEE ANYTHING BACKING OUT INTO THE DRIVEWAY. SO THEY DO THAT 24 SEVEN. THERE'S NO CARS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY. IT'S EMPTY, SO THEY BLOCK OUR VIEW ON THE SIDEWALK. THEY BLOCK OUR VIEW ON THE STREET. SO WHEN WE BACK OUT, WE CAN'T SEE. WE ALMOST BEEN HIT SEVERAL TIMES. OUR KIDS HAVE TO GET OFF THE SIDEWALK TO WALK TO GET HOME. WE DIDN'T HAVE THIS ISSUE UNTIL RECENTLY WHEN THEY STARTED GETTING PETTY AND BLOCKING OUR VIEWS AND EVERYTHING. SHE'LL LEAVE AT 730 IN THE MORNING. TURN ON THE MUSIC. THE METAL AMPLIFIES IT. SOUND. THERE'S BEEN SEVERAL POLICE REPORTS ALSO DONE ON THAT. IT'S NOT, YOU KNOW, IT'S WE DIDN'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT WHEN IT WAS OPEN. BUT AS THEY STARTED CLOSING IT, IT STARTED TO BECOME A PROBLEM. OKAY. YEAH. BECAUSE IT'S LIKE IT'S ONE THING TO PUT IN A CARPORT OPEN, BUT TO CLOSE ONLY ONE SITE AND THEN BLOCK THE REST OF THE VIEW WITH YOUR VEHICLES. WHEN YOU HAVE AN OPEN SPOT ON THE SITE. I SENT VIDEOS, I'VE SENT PICTURES ON THE EMAIL. YOU CAN SEE WHERE SHE'S DOING THAT. AND IT'S INTENTIONAL. IT'S INTENTIONAL. SHE'S GOT SEVERAL REPORTS, POLICE REPORTS OF THIS ONGOING, ONGOING, ONGOING. JUST LAST WEEK, ONE OF THE NEIGHBORS CALLED BECAUSE THE MUSIC AMPLIFIES. WHEN SHE LEAVES, YOU CAN HEAR IT. YOU CAN HEAR IT INTO MY HOUSE NEXT DOOR. THAT'S HOW BAD IT'S GOTTEN. SO IT'S NOT SAFE FOR US. IT'S NOT SAFE FOR OUR KIDS EITHER. FOR HER TO BE BLOCKING THE DRIVEWAY AND THE SIDEWALK. SHE DID GET A VIOLATION FOR THAT ALSO. SO I'M JUST ASKING YOU TO PLEASE HAVE HER REMOVE THE SIDING FOR OUR SAFETY AS WE BACK OUT, BECAUSE WE DESERVE THAT SAFETY AS WELL COMING OUT OF OUR HOUSE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS, MA'AM. STAFF, DO WE KNOW IS THE SIDING JUST ON ONE SIDE OR IS IT ON BOTH SIDES? JUST ON ONE SIDE? THE NEIGHBOR SIDE. OKAY. THEY PUT UP THE CAN YOU STATE YOUR STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD, SIR, I'M HER HUSBAND, JAIME SALINAS. THANK YOU SIR, I'M THE NEIGHBOR. THE WALLS CAME UP ONCE. THEY PUT UP THEIR ALUMINUM FENCE. ANY OTHER EXTRA PIECES? THE GENTLEMAN STARTED PUTTING THEM UP. HE STARTED BLOCKING THE WALL. BEFORE WE DIDN'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE ACTUAL PORCH. THERE'S NO BIG DEAL. BUT IT'S WHEN HE STARTED PUTTING ALL THOSE WALLS. HE STARTED BLOCKING OUR VIEW, AND THEN THEY PARKED IT. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU SAW THE FORT. 150. THEY PARK IT AT THE END OF THE [00:40:03] STREET AND ON THE RIGHT SIDE WHERE THE LITTLE BLACK ONES THERE THE THE PARK IT THERE OR THEY'LL PARK THE BLACK ONE, THE BLACK TRUCK ALL THE WAY TO THE END OF THE DRIVEWAY AND WE CAN'T GET UP. AND THEN THEY PARKED LIKE SHE SAYS, THE OTHER ONE, THE OTHER. SO I MEAN, IT'S JUST ONCE THEY PUT THAT WALL UP, THEY BLENDED US. WE CAN'T SEE WHEN WE'RE BACKING UP, BACK OUT WITH SAFETY. WE CAN'T. YEAH. CORRECT. AND THEN THEY'RE BLOCKING THE SIDEWALK. LIKE YOU SAID EARLIER, THE SIDEWALK IS CLEAR OR THEY PARK THEIR CARS HERE ALL THE WAY. YOU KNOW, THE SCHOOL DISTRICT WITHIN THE TWO MILE RADIUS. KIDS HAVE TO WALK HOME. YEAH. OUR KIDS HAVE TO GET OFF THE SIDEWALK TO GO AROUND THE CAR JUST TO GET THE OTHER SIDE. THE BUS DROPS THEM OFF ON, WHICH IS ON THE OTHER. I'M JUST DOING IT FOR THE SAFETY OF OUR CHILDREN, OUR WALKERS. WE HAVE A LOT OF WALKERS IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD, AND FOR US TO BACK OUT OF OUR PROPERTY SAFELY, TO GO TO WHERE WE GOT TO GO. AND IT'S BEEN SOMETHING I'VE SEEN IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD THAT, YOU KNOW, WE ASKED FOR SPEED BUMPS BECAUSE THEY SPEED THROUGH THERE AND THERE'S SO MANY VEHICLES AND THEN, YOU KNOW. SHE DIDN'T HAVE ANY SPACE IN SIGHT BECAUSE SHE DOES. SHE JUST DOING IT INTENTIONALLY. IT'S 24 OVER SEVEN THAT SHE DOES THAT ALL THE TIME. SO EVERYTHING WAS GOOD ASIDE FROM WHEN THEY STARTED PUTTING SOME PANELING ON THE SIDE. YOU CAN SEE THE THIS SIDE, ONLY THE ONE SIDE. AND THEN IT DOESN'T HELP THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAS PLENTY OF VEHICLES. YES. AND THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS THAT AS A CITY ALSO WE WE, YOU KNOW, WE CAN'T REALLY CONTROL HOW MANY. BUT I KNOW EXACTLY WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. YEAH. THIS IS THE ONLY ONE. SHE DECIDED TO CLOSE ON ONE SIDE AFTER THE CARPORT THAT WENT UP. THEY WENT DURING THE COVID. THOSE ARE TALL. THEY'RE FLAT OR HIGH. THEY DON'T HAVE ANY WALLS. THIS IS THE ONLY ONE THAT HAS WALL. AND IT'S BLOCKING OUR VIEW THROUGH WHEN WE'RE TRYING TO GET OUT. I TRY TO GET OUT. MY DAUGHTER TRIES TO GET OUT. MY SON TRIES TO GET OUT. WE CAN'T SEE. SO THAT'S WHY WE'RE HERE. BECAUSE WE APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS AND WE DO UNDERSTAND YOUR CONCERNS. THANK YOU. IS THE APPLICANT HERE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THE ITEM? CHRISTY GUZMAN? EDINBURG, TEXAS. ME THE CARPORT. COMPANY. POCO A POCO C COMO HEMOS ESTADO AGREGANDO PORQUE LA VECINOS BIOMÉDICA EN LAS CAMARAS DIRECTAMENTE PARA MI CASA. Y ESO ME MOLESTA COMO YO QUIERO EL CORAZON. MIS COSAS AFUERA DE LA CAMARA COMPLETAMENTE PARA MI LUGAR APART. YO TENGO UN HIJO. POLITICOS. ENTONCES EN CERCA DE CON LOS SPEAKERS ENTONCES. EN SU CASA ACERCA EL ESTOMAGO. ENTONCES NOSOTROS DECIDIMOS ESTAR POCO A POCO PORQUE PORQUE ATAQUES Y NO QUIERO ENTONCES ES LA RAZON POR LO PUSIMOS. HACE POCO. ESTE ES UN COMENTARIO FUERA DE ELLA. PORQUE. MIS COSAS BASURA. MUCHOS ANOS AFUERA A. ESTADO. NO NOS PODEMOS SACAR PERMISO ELLA VIVA LA GENTE SE FUERA. ESO ES UN PROBLEMA PERSONAL. AHORA TENGO. YO LO REMOVAL. PERO DESDE. HASTA AHORA Y SI PORQUE ESTO ES ESTO ESO SI. ESTOY HACIENDO ES ESTO ES PORQUE MOLESTA POR TODO. LA MUSICA EST LA MOLESTA. TODO ESTA SENORA. ENTONCES YO TAMBIÉN TENGO. UNA CIUDAD PARA VIVIR COMO MI HIJO ES EPILEPTIC. SOY YO TENGO Y PARA MI HIJO. GRACIAS. GRACIAS POR SENORA. SU NOMBRE CRISTINA GUZMAN. ESTE PUES GRACIAS POR SUS COMENTARIOS. YO CREO Q AQUI EN ESTA SITUACION ESOS. ALGO PARA SI. NECESITAN HACER ALGO RESPECTO AL NECESITAN. USTEDES A LA CORTE OR HACER UN RECLAMO. PERO AHORITA ESTAMOS VIENDO ES LO DEL CARPORT LO LOS PANELS. PERO SI SI SI ESTE LA [00:45:13] VISIBILIDAD DE SUS VECINOS. SO PERO TAMBIÉN LA SEGURIDAD DE MI HIJO SI. PARA Q UN ATAQUE NO ACCIDENT. NO LO PUEDO TENER TODO EL TIEMPO EN LA CASA DENTRO. DEL DE LA TARDE. LLEGA MI CASA FUERA ENTENDEMOS. PERO. ALGO PERMISO PARA ESTE CORPORATE. NO. SERA OKAY. PERMISO. CUENTA. HASTA AHORA ESTA AHI CONFERENCIAS. OKAY I HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF. THAT SHORT FENCE THAT'S THERE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE CARPORT. IS THAT EVEN ALLOWED. BUILDING THAT THAT THAT WE ALLOW FENCES IN THE SIDES OR THE FRONT. IF IT'S IS OTHER HOUSES HAVING THE SAME TYPE OR FENCES BUT LIKE THIS ONE, IF IT'S MORE THAN THREE FEET HIGH. NO, BUT THIS ONE IS LIKE LIKE THREE FEET. OKAY. I'M JUST THINKING THAT IN A CASE OF A HURRICANE OR, YOU KNOW, STRONG WINDS, YOU KNOW, ALL THAT SHEET METAL CAN CAN BE CAUSE DAMAGE, RIGHT? SO I WAS JUST CURIOUS IF THAT WAS EVEN ALLOWED OR THAT KIND OF MATERIAL FOR, FOR A FENCE IN THE CITY. IN THE CITY WE ALLOWED IF THEY APPLY FOR THE PERMIT, BECAUSE IN THIS CASE THEY DIDN'T APPLY A PERMIT FOR THAT KIND OF FENCE. OKAY. THANK YOU. YEAH. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE? THE PANEL'S RIGHT. THE THE PANELS ON THE CARPORT AND THE PANELS ON THE FENCE. SO IF YOU LOOK AT THE PICTURE RIGHT HERE, THAT'S ON THE SCREEN, YOU SEE THE FENCE. THERE'S A SHORT FENCE THERE WITH SHEET METALS PANELS. SO YES, IN THIS CASE THEY DIDN'T APPLY A PERMIT FOR THE CARPORT OR THE FENCE. SO WE DIDN'T REVIEW THE MATERIALS OR, OR THE STRUCTURE. THE STAFF KNOW WHEN THE PANELS WERE PUT ON. NO, NO. FIND OUT ABOUT THE CAR. THE CARPORT WAS THE APPRAISAL DISTRICT. BUT FOR FENCES WE WE DON'T HAVE THE THE INFORMATION. AND THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE ANOTHER VARIANCE OR ANOTHER. YEP. CORRECT. OKAY. BUT IT SEEMS TO ME LIKE THERE'S A, YOU KNOW, CLEAR COMPROMISE HERE AND THE ENTIRE STRUCTURE IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE. BUT WHAT SEEMS TO BE THE ISSUE FOR THE NEIGHBOR IS IS THE PANELS, RIGHT. CORRECT. SO YOU KNOW, AND YOU KNOW, WE HAVE TO TAKE THAT OF, YOU KNOW, AS OUR PRIORITY, KEEPING EVERYONE'S SAFETY IN MIND. SO I THINK GETTING RID OF THE PANELS MAY MAKE A GOOD COMPROMISE IN THE SITUATIONS WHERE THE APPLICANT CAN KEEP THE CARPORT AND THE NEIGHBOR CAN FEEL SAFER WITH AND BE ABLE TO SEE THE INCOMING TRAFFIC, OR WHAT MR. HYMAN MENTIONED. ALSO, ONE OF THE FIRST PANELS THAT'S ACTUALLY THERE ON THEIR VIEW SPOT ALSO COULD BE MORE SURE IS THE I HAVE A QUESTION FOR THE NEIGHBOR NEIGHBOR. WOULD YOU CAN YOU PLEASE APPROACH THE PODIUM? GRACIAS. MR. GUZMAN POR SUS COMENTARIOS. HOW MANY OF THESE PANELS OBSTRUCT YOUR VIEW? ALL RIGHT. EXCUSE ME. ALL OF IT. ALL OF IT. THEY'RE ALL SMALL LITTLE PIECES. IT'S LIKE HE JUST CAME BACK THURSDAY. THEY HAD REMOVED TWO AND HE PUT IT RIGHT BACK ON. SO IT'S LIKE THEY'RE SMALL PIECES HERE AND THERE THAT HE'S PUTTING ON. SO I MEAN, IF THE WAY THEY DRIVE, THE WAY THEY PARK, THEY SHE HAS TO REMOVE ALL OF IT SO WE CAN GET A VIEW OF INCOMING TRAFFIC PANELS THAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT. THEY HAD REMOVED THEM. AND WHEN HE CAME BACK FROM WORK ON THURSDAY, HE PUT HIM BACK ON. YEAH. AND SHE WAS PARKING HER TRUCK RIGHT THERE WHERE THE AREA WAS OPEN. SHE WAS BLOCKING THE AREA WITH HER TRUCK. YEAH. BECAUSE YEAH, THAT THAT GMC IS TIGHT. SO WE WOULD NEED TO HAVE IT REMOVED TO SEE STAFF. DO WE HAVE ANY RECOMMENDATION ON THIS? I MEAN, IS THERE IS THERE I GUESS A BUILDING REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE CITY THAT CAN GO AND SEE WHAT ACTUALLY IS OBSTRUCTING AND HOW MANY PANELS WE NEED TO REMOVE? YEAH, BECAUSE WE DIDN'T HAVE AN ISSUE WHEN IT WAS OPEN. IT'S JUST WHEN THEY CLOSED IT. YEAH. YEAH [00:50:01] I CAN GET MORE. SO IN THIS CASE MY RECOMMENDATION IS THEY NEED FIRST TO COMPLY WITH ALL THE OTHER REQUIREMENTS. SO THEY NEED TO COMPLY WITH BUILDING DEPARTMENT BECAUSE THEY ARE ACTUALLY THEY APPLY FOR THE PERMIT FOR THE CARPORT. SO THEY ARE REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE CARPORT FOR THE ENCROACHMENT INTO THE FRONT AND THE SIDE SETBACK. BUT THEY ALSO NEED TO COMPLY WITH ALL THE OTHER REQUIREMENTS. SO YEAH, BUILDING DEPARTMENT NEEDS TO BE INVOLVED IN THIS. AND ALSO OUR RECOMMENDATION IS LIKE REMOVE REMOVE THE OBSTRUCTION. RIGHT. SO YEAH OBSTRUCTION OKAY. THE SIDE OF OBSTRUCTION I THINK THAT'S A THAT'S A FAIR REQUEST. AND I THINK THAT'S A FAIR COMPROMISE IN MY OPINION. OKAY. I MAKE A MOTION. YOU'RE LOOKING AT THE THREE FOOT. CAN YOU SPEAK INTO THE MICROPHONE SIR. ALUMINUM WALL THAT YOU WERE LOOKING AT THE THREE FOOT. YES. THAT ONE GOES ALL THE WAY AROUND. US. SIX FOOT. OKAY. YEAH FOR SURE. AS I MENTIONED, IF IN THAT CASE, IF OTHER HOUSES HAVE THE SAME KIND OF FENCES THE CITY ALLOWS TO THE OWNERS TO HAVE FENCES IN THE FRONT AND SIDE YARDS NO MORE THAN THREE FEET HIGH, BUT THEY ALSO NEED TO APPLY FOR A PERMIT. SO THEY WILL NEED TO APPLY FOR THE APARTMENT. SO ALSO BUILDING CAN BE INVOLVED IN THIS. I THINK IT'D BE A GOOD IDEA TO MAYBE SEND SOMEBODY OUT TO THIS NEIGHBORHOOD AND SEE HOW MANY HOMES HAVE THIS KIND OF FENCE AND SEE IF THEY APPLIED FOR A PERMIT. AND ALSO, I PERSONALLY THINK THAT THAT KIND OF MATERIAL FOR FENCE IS NOT ADEQUATE FOR, FOR A HOME IN THAT AREA. SO I, I WOULD RECOMMEND FOR THEM TO SUBMIT ANOTHER VARIANCE FOR THAT FENCE. I THINK THAT THAT'S MORE FOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT. BUT THEY NEED THEY THEY CAN APPLY FOR THE PERMIT. SO BUILDING PERMIT CAN EVALUATE THAT STRUCTURE. AND THAT'S A VARIANCE FOR ANOTHER DAY. CORRECT. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. IS THERE ANY MORE COMMENTS QUESTIONS. OKAY. THANK YOU SIR. ANY MORE COMMENTS. QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. ANY MORE QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD? IF NOT, I'LL GO. YES, SIR. COME ON. COME ON UP. I'M. I'M HER. HER COUSIN. YES, SIR. I JUST WANT TO KNOW IF THEY REMOVED THAT THREE FOOT FENCE, IS THE PROBLEM GOING TO END OR IT'S GOING TO KEEP ON? WELL, WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT THE FENCE RIGHT NOW. THE ONLY ISSUE THAT WE'RE WE'RE ABOUT THE SITE IS THE THE PANELS ON THIS. ALL WE CAN DO IS, YOU KNOW, EITHER APPROVE OR DENY THE CARPORT AND EITHER WITH OR WITHOUT CONDITIONS AND WHETHER THE PROBLEM GETS FIXED OR NOT, WE, YOU KNOW, THE. REMOVING REMOVING THAT SITE METAL THING, THE SIDE PANELS, SIDE PANEL, THAT COULD BE BUT THE OF THE FENCE OR THE CARPORT. THE CARPORT. CARPORT THE CARPORT OKAY. THE FENCE WOULD HAVE TO BE AT ANOTHER TIME. OH OKAY I GOT YOU. THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ANY MORE QUESTIONS? COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC? CAN I MAKE A MOTION? MR. CHAIR? LET ME GO AHEAD AND CLOSE IT. I'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE. YES, SIR. COME ON UP CLOSE. MY NAME IS JUAN MELENDEZ. THE QUESTION AS FAR AS, LIKE, YOU KNOW, AS FAR AS SETBACKS IN TERMS OF THE VISIBILITY, I UNDERSTAND OBVIOUSLY THAT THE ONE RESIDENT IS NOT ABLE TO BE BE ABLE TO SEE TOO MUCH, AND THE OTHER ONE IS ACTUALLY PROTECTING THEIR PRIVACY. BUT AS FAR AS SETBACKS, I UNDERSTAND THAT THE CARPORT, A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF OF LENGTH DOES. I'M I'M BEING NEUTRAL HERE IS IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE ONE AND THE OTHER ONE IS THERE ONLY LIKE A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF FEET THAT CAN BE REMOVED IN TERMS OF THE SIDE PANELS, THE METAL ONES? OR DO YOU HAVE TO REMOVE EVERYTHING THAT WAS ADDED ON THE SIDE OF THE CARPORT? YOU KNOW, I MEAN, IN TERMS OF VISIBILITY, I DON'T THINK THAT YOU WOULD NEED ALL THE ALL THE CARPORT TO BE REMOVED COMPLETELY TO SAY THAT, YOU KNOW, I HAVE ENOUGH FOOTAGE TO BE ABLE TO SEE LIKE SIDEWAY AS FAR AS, LIKE THE 45 DEGREE OR WHATEVER, THE DEGREE THAT YOU WILL BE ABLE TO SEE BACKING OUT. RIGHT. THE ISSUE WITH THAT IS THAT WE DON'T HAVE THOSE FACTS IN FRONT OF US. RIGHT? SO WHETHER WHAT WHAT'S ACCEPTABLE, WHAT HOW MANY PANELS NEED TO BE REMOVED? YOU KNOW, ONE PERSON SAID SOMETHING, THE OTHER ONE SAYS ANOTHER THING. AND WE [00:55:04] DON'T HAVE ANY ANALYSIS, ANY STUDY ON IT. SO I THINK FOR US TO PLAY IT SAFE IS JUST REMOVE THE ENTIRE THING SO THAT WE JUST COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL THE OBSTRUCTION. AND I THINK THAT'S WHERE THE BOARD'S MAYBE LEANING TOWARDS. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE DECISION WILL BE, WILL BE ONCE WE WE ASK FOR THE BOARD FOR A MOTION. BUT TO SAY THAT, YEAH, I THINK HALF A PANEL OR TWO PANELS WILL DO IT. WE JUST DON'T HAVE THAT INFORMATION IN FRONT OF, IN FRONT OF US TO BE ABLE TO, TO, TO MAKE THAT DECISION. OKAY. SO TO ME IT'S EITHER WE ALLOW IT OR WE DON'T. YEAH. ALRIGHT. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SIR. ANY MORE COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC? IF NOT, I'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE COMMENT SECTION AND I'LL ASK THE BOARD FOR A MOTION. MR. CHAIR, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE VARIANCE WITH THE STIPULATION THAT THE PANELS ARE REMOVED. I HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE PANELS ON THE CARPORT CARPORT TO BE REMOVED. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND? I HAVE A SECOND FROM MR. GARZA. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION PASSES. MOVING ON TO ITEM SEVEN. F VARIANCE REQUEST BY MELBOURNE AND HUNT INC FOR A VARIANCE TO THE CITY OF EDINBURGH UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW THE REDUCTION OF A SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 6FT TO 5FT, BEING LOTS ONE THROUGH 39. LAS VILLAS AT SEA AT LA SIENNA SUBDIVISION, [F. Variance Request by Melden & Hunt, Inc. for a Variance to the City of Edinburg Unified] CITY OF EDINBURG COUNTY, TEXAS, LOCATED AT 1891 BURNS BOULEVARD. THE APPLICANT, REQUESTING A UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUESTING THE REDUCTION OF A SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 6FT TO 5FT. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED ALONG EAST BURNS BOULEVARD. THE CURRENTLY PROPERTY ZONING IS RESIDENTIAL PRIMARY DISTRICT. THE PROPERTY IS PART OF THE LAS VEGAS AT LA SIENNA SUBDIVISION THAT WAS RECORDED ON DECEMBER 5TH, 2025. SETBACK FOR THIS LOT ARE AS FOLLOWS. FROM 20 SIDE SIX AND REAR TEN. THE PROPERTY WENT THROUGH A DIFFERENT SUBDIVISION. VARIANCES THAT WERE APPROVED. STAFF MAIL A NOTICE OF THE VARIANCE REQUEST TO 42 PROPERTY OWNERS ON DECEMBER 5TH, AND RECEIVED NO COMMENTS IN FAVOR OR AGAINST THIS REQUEST AT THE TIME THAT THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 6 TO 5 TO ALLOW TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL BUILDING SPACE. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE REQUEST IF APPROVED, THE APPLICANT. WE ALSO NEED TO COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER REQUIREMENTS DURING THE PERMITTING PROCESS. THANK YOU ANNA. I'LL NOW OPEN THIS ITEM FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS. IS THE APPLICANT HERE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THE ITEM? IS IT THE SAME COMMENTS AS THE PREVIOUS ONE OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY MORE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC? OKAY. THEN I'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENT SECTION ON THIS ITEM AND I'LL ASK THE BOARD FOR A MOTION I MOTION TO APPROVE. I HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL FOR MR. GARZA. SECOND, FOR MR. GARZA. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION PASSES. MOVING ON TO ITEM SEVEN, G VARIANCE REQUEST BY HOLLYWOOD DEVELOPMENT FOR A VARIANCE TO THE CITY OF EDINBURGH UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW TO MAINTAIN TWO SUBDIVISION ENTRY WALLS THAT WERE CONSTRUCTED CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT A BUILDING PERMIT, EACH WALL IS APPROXIMATELY 20FT HIGH FROM NATURAL GRADE, AND HAS AN [G. Variance Request by Hollywood Development for a Variance to the City of Edinburg Unified] ESTIMATED AREA OF ABOUT FIVE SIX 560FT■!S, BEING LOT ONE AND LOT 22. CRESTWOOD ESTATE SUBDIVISION, HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS, LOCATED AT 3201 NORTH ROGERS ROAD. YES, MR. CHAIRMAN, GOOD EVENING. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR PLANNING AND ZONING. AT THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, THEY ARE REQUESTING THAT THIS ITEM BE TABLED. AT THIS TIME. THERE IS SOME FURTHER REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE BETWEEN THEM AND OUR UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. SO THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, THEY'RE REQUESTING THAT THIS ITEM BE TABLED AND BE BROUGHT BACK TO THE NEXT MEETING IN JANUARY. IS THAT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT? YES, SIR. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. IS THERE A MOTION THAT WE NEED TO TAKE FOR THAT COUNSEL? YEAH, IT WOULD HAVE TO BE A MOTION TO TABLE. THE MOTION TO TABLE. OKAY. THANK YOU. DO I OKAY. WELL I'LL ASK THE PUBLIC FOR, FOR COMMENTS AS THEIR COMMENTS ON THIS ITEM. OKAY. THANK YOU. THEN I'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENT SECTION ON THIS ITEM AND I'LL ASK THE BOARD FOR A MOTION. SO MOVED A MOTION TO TABLE THE ITEM TO TABLE THE ITEM. MR. GONZALEZ, IS THERE A SECOND SECOND FOR MR. GILBERT? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION TABLED. MOVING ON TO [01:00:03] ITEM. ITEM EIGHT. ATTENDANCE. ROSTER. THE NOT GOING TO. OKAY THEN. ITEM NINE MEETING ADJOURNMENT. CAN I GET A MOTION TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. SO MOVED A MOTION FOR MR. GONZALEZ. [8. INFORMATION ONLY] SECOND FOR MR. GARZA. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. MOTION PASSES. THANK YOU. THANK [9. ADJOURNMENT] YOU. GENTLEMEN. Y'ALL HAVE A HAPPY HOLIDAYS. WE'LL SEE YOU NEXT YEAR. NEXT YEAR. HAPPY HOLIDAYS. YES. THANK YOU STEPH. NEXT YEAR. YES. AND THERE IS ALSO A DINNER IN THE BACK. OKAY. TIME TO SHINE RIGHT THERE, GUYS. AND JUST STAY TRUE TO SINGLE FAMILY. EACH LOT WILL HAVE ITS OWN DEEDED PLAT LIKE DEEDED LOT. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS OR ANY CONCERNS THAT YOU GUYS MIGHT HAVE. OKAY, I HAVE A QUESTION. THE THESE LOTS ARE * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.