THE NEXT ITEM IS EXECUTIVE SESSION SO CAN I GET A MOTION TO EXIT THE OPEN SESSION AND MOVE
[00:00:06]
INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION? SECOND ON FAVOR SAY AYE. IT IS 6 35, AND WE'RE GOING INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION. YOU'RE ECSTATIC. ABOUT WHAT? I THINK WE ARE GOOD. WE CAN START WHENEVER YOU'RE REGISTERING. HERE COMES YOUR ATTORNEY SO WE CAN GET GOING.YES, READY? ALRIGHT. CALL THIS MEETING TO ORDER TO ESTABLISH THAT WE DO HAVE A QUORUM. UM
[1. Call Meeting To Order, Establish Quorum A. Prayer]
YES. OKAY. WOULD YOU PLEASE WRITE? PREPARE? LET US PRAY. HAVE ANY FATHER. WE COME TO YOU TODAY ASKING FOR YOUR GUIDANCE WISDOM. AND SUPPORT AS WE BEGIN TODAY'S MEETING. HELP US TO ENGAGE IN MEANINGFUL DISCUSSION. ALLOW US TO GROW CLOSER AS A GROUP. AND NURTURE THE BONDS OF COMMUNITIES. SO THIS WITH YOUR GRACE, LORD GUARD AS WE MAKE DECISIONS THAT MIGHT AFFECT OUR CITY AND CONTINUE TO REMIND US THAT ALL THAT WE DO HERE TODAY.ALL THAT WE ACCOMPLISHED IS FOR THE BETTERMENT OF OUR CITY. WE ASK THESE THINGS IN YOUR NAME.
[B. Pledge of Allegiance]
ALL RIGHT. ALLEGIANCE. UNITED STATES GO BACK. THANK YOU AND GOOD EVENING STAFF[2. Certification of Public Notice]
IS CERTIFIED PUBLIC NOTICE. YES MR. CHAIRMAN STOP THIS CERTIFIED PUBLIC NOTICE OUT FOR THE TEXAS[3. Disclosure of Conflict of Interest]
OPEN MEETINGS ACT WE DID NOTIFY THE PUBLIC HAS GOT 5 P.M. ON THE SIXTH OF OCTOBER. THANK YOU. DO YOU HAVE ANY DISCLOSURES OF CONFLICT FOR MANY OF THE COMMISSION MEMBERS AT THIS TIME, OKAY. WE'LL MOVE ON. WE'LL OPEN FOR I'M SORRY. DO YOU CAN HAVE A MOTION TO CONSIDER[ABSENCES]
THE EXCUSING THE ABSENCE OF MR CHAIRMAN, MR JOKO FOR THE SEPTEMBER 12 2023 REGULAR[00:05:02]
MEETINGS AND EXCUSING THE ABSENCE OF COMMISSIONER VICTOR DEANIAC FROM THE SEPTEMBER 12 23 2023 REGULAR MEETING THAT MOTION. NO SECOND. SECOND, EVERYBODY FAVORITE PREVIOUSLY RIGHT HAND. VERY AGAINST SAFE SIGN MOTION CARRIES. ALRIGHT WELL GOING TO PUBLIC COMMENTS.I'M OPEN FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. ANYONE WISH TO MAKE ANY COMMENTS PIECE UP INTO THE PODIUM. NONE
[5. PUBLIC COMMENTS]
WILL CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENT. HMM GO UNDER, UH, SO PLEASED COMMISSION. YOU'VE SEEN THE[MINUTES]
[Consider Approval of the Minutes for the September 12, 2023 Regular Meeting 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS]
MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 12TH 2023. THERE'S NO AUDITIONS WERE DELICIOUS CORRECTIONS MOTION FOR APPROVAL. SO MOVE SECRETARY APPROVAL ALL THOSE FAVORITES RIGHT HAND POST HIM SIGN MOTION CARRIES. UNDER PUBLIC HEARINGS, PUBLIC HEARING THIS IS CONSIDERED THE REZONING REQUEST.[7. A.]
FROM THE AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT TO RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY BEING A ONE ACRE TRACK. OF LAND OUT OF LIKE, EIGHT BLOCKS, 55, ALAMO LAND AND SUGAR COMPANIES SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 3000, EAST WISCONSIN. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT.THIS PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY LOCATED ON WISCONSIN ROAD ON THE NORTH SIDE. JUST FEW FEET AWAY FROM RONNIE. THIS PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY DON'T AGRICULTURAL ZONING. REQUEST IS TO ZONE CHANGE TO MULTI FAMILY. WE DO HAVE THIS AROUND ME. ZONING UM, WE DO HAVE MULTI FAMILY IN THE AREA. TO THE NORTH AND TO THE EAST. WE DO HAVE TO LIVE ON VIA SUBDIVISION, WHICH IS A MULTI FAMILY. DEVELOPMENT THAT WAS ACTUALLY RECORDED OCTOBER 26TH 2015 TO THE WEST. WE HAVE AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT, WHICH IS SOMETHING OF FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES. THIS PROPERTY. THE AREA WAS PANICS. THE MINUTE ROUGHLY ABOUT 2015 ISH. SO RIGHT NOW, THAT'S WHY THE SURROUNDING AREAS HIS OWN AGRICULTURAL AS DEVELOPMENT COMES IN. WE REQUEST THAT THEY GO THROUGH THE ZONE CHANGE PROCESS. I'M GOING TO KEEP IN MIND. THE FUTURE LAND USED FOR THIS AREA IS SUBURBAN.
WE DO HAVE THE SURVEY ON YOUR SCREENS. KEEP IN MIND THAT THE MINIMUM LOT FURNITURE FOR MULTI FAMILY APARTMENT 80 FT. CURRENTLY THIS PROPERTY HAS 67 FT OF FRONTAGE ALONG WISCONSIN ROADS, SO IF APPROVED, THEY WOULD NEED TO GO THROUGH A VARIANT REQUEST FOR THE MINIMUM REQUIRED OF LAW AREA. IT'S JUST A LITTLE BIT WE DO HAVE A PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN THAT HAS BEEN PROVIDED. THIS IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. BUT THIS IS JUST SOMETHING THAT THEY HAVE PROVIDED FOR US TO CONSIDER. STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL AS THE SURROUNDING AREA DOES. THEN ITSELF FOR MULTI FAMILY WITHIN THE AREA. WE DO HAVE REPRESENTATIVES HERE. THANK YOU, EVERYONE. SHOULD ANYONE WISH TO MAKE ANY COMMENTS. PLEASE STEP UP TO THE POINT. MR FOR THE STATE. YOUR NAME, PLEASE. THE MICROPHONE. SELENE SANCHEZ. UM.
I AM NOW SINCE MY FATHER HAS DECEASED, SUDDENLY PART OWNER OF THE WHITE HOUSE THAT YOU SEE THERE ON THAT PICTURE. UM I AM CONTESTING THE REZONING. BECAUSE THAT AREA IS REALLY NARROW ON THE OTHER SIDE. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU HAVE THE MAP ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE, UM ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THAT AREA. THERE IS THERE WAS APARTMENTS BUILT AND THAT AREA IS VERY, VERY NARROW, AND THE AREA THAT THEY WANT TO REZONE IS EVEN MORE NARROW. THAN THAT AREA. ALSO THERE IS FLOODING THE UM. COMPLEXES HAVE BEEN BUILT. I KNOW BECAUSE I'VE GOTTEN MY DRUG STUCK IN THERE. SO THERE'S A FLOODING PROBLEM IN THAT AREA. IT IS A VERY, VERY NARROW LOT. IT'S MORE NARROW THAN THE OTHER LOT WHERE THEY BARELY SQUEEZED IN. SOME COMPLEXES THERE. SO I WOULD ALSO I DON'T KNOW HOW THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO GET INTO THE COMPLEX IS THAT THEY PLAN TO BUILD UM, THE ROAD STRUCTURE, THEY WOULD HAVE TO GO ALL THE WAY AROUND. IT'S A CONGESTION ISSUE ALSO BECAUSE WE DO HAVE EDINBURGH HIGH SCHOOL. IN THAT AREA. UM. BUT THAT LOT IS VERY, VERY NARROW FOR APARTMENTS TO BE BUILT. I MEAN, YOU WOULD HAVE TO BE BUILDING LIKE MICRO APARTMENTS TO BE THERE. AH SO THAT IS MY CONCERN FOR THAT PARTICULAR LOT. IT IS NOT MEANT TO HAVE APARTMENTS THERE BECAUSE OF THE NARROWNESS OF IT. THANK YOU, MISS SANCHEZ.
APPRECIATE IT. QUESTIONS. ANYONE ELSE WANT TO MAKING A COMPASS? STEP OF THE PODIUM AND STATE
[00:10:07]
YOUR NAME, PLEASE? MY NAME IS MR MANAGED ON BEHALF OF THE SAME THING TO NEARING. WE'RE REPRESENTING ON ADRIAN WEBB, REQUESTING IS RESIGNING. UM WE WERE. IN FACT, WE'RE OF THE OF THE NARROW OF THE OF THE TRACK. UM, HOWEVER, WERE WE'RE TRYING TO BUILD SOME APARTMENTS. THERE'S THE MAIN ENTRANCE. WHAT WE'RE CONSIDERING IS ON THE NORTH SIDE, NOT ON THE ON WISCONSIN SIDE BECAUSE WE ARE AWARE ABOUT THE SHORT DISTANCE FROM THAT INTERSECTION. THAT'S A PROBLEM THAT WE HAD IN MIND. FORTUNATELY ON THE FRONT, WHICH IS ALONG WISCONSIN, THERE'S SOME . THERE'S SOME IRRIGATION LINES AND ALL THAT WE DON'T WANT TO AFFECT AT ALL. SO WE'RE TRYING TO KEEP THE APARTMENT JUST ONE BIG COMPLEX WITH MULTIPLE, UH ALL UNITS. BETWEEN 111 COMPLEX AND REAR IS GOING TO BE JUST FOR PARKING AND DETENTION AREA, WHICH IS GOING TO BE ACCOMMODATING ANY STORM SYSTEM THAT NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED FOR THIS THIS LOT SO IT WILL PREVENT NO FLOODING ALONG THIS THIS THIS AREA. HOW MANY UNITS ARE YOU PLANNING TO PUT IN THERE? UM APPARENTLY, IT'S COMING. WHAT WE HAVE. APPROXIMATE CALCULATED BASED ON THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE PARKING SPACE AND ALL THAT. WE'RE ANTICIPATING ABOUT BUT SO IT'S GONNA BE ONE EITHER ONE OR TWO UNITS. WITH 22 APARTMENTS, CUT OR THREE AND THEN TWO. IT DEPENDS ON THE ON GENERATION OF THE DETENTION AREA FOR WHICH IS THE FUND SYSTEM. HOW MUCH OF A STORM SYSTEM? WE NEED IN ORDER SO WE CAN PREVENT ANY FLOODING OR ANY ADDITIONAL FLOATING TO IT IS THEIR TRAININGS DOWN IN WISCONSIN. YES, THERE'S A. OH NOT ALWAYS GONE SING, BUT WE HAVE THERE'S AN ENDED, UM BELLA OF FORCED METAPHORS RIGHT IN FRONT OF IT. SO WE'RE CONNECTING TO THAT IN THAT WE HAVE TO SHOW WE HAVE TO DETAIN ON THE SIDE. THAT'S A REQUIREMENT OVER THE OVERFLOW IS GOING TO GO INTO A STORM SYSTEM UP. NEXT YEAR. EXODUS WHEN. THE ACCENT. IT'S GOING TO BE THE SAME ENTRANCE WE'RE TRYING TO DO , UH, ON PARADISO, SO DRIVE THE ENTRANCE AND THEN IT'S GOING TO BE ONE ENTRANCE AND EXIT ONLY ON BELLA FORCE. THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO. TO MITIGATE AND I KNOW THE REQUIREMENT BASED ON WISCONSIN AND THE NEXT INTERSECTION THAT IT'S RIGHT NEXT TO IT. IT'S SUCH SHORT GAP , SO WE'RE NOT TRYING TO CONSIDER THAT ONE. BECAUSE HE MAY BE A TRAFFIC IMPACT AS WELL. SO YOU'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE AN INTRODUCTORY WISCONSIN? I WOULD SAY NO AS OF NOW, BECAUSE, LIKE I SAID, THERE'S IRRIGATION. THERE'S SOME WATER LINES.THERE'S A LOT OF PERMITTING THAT WE NEED TO GO THROUGH AN EXISTING SUBDIVISION. IS THAT EXISTING SUBJECT TO SINGLE FAMILY OR IS IT MULTI MULTI PLANS? MULTI FAMILY IN YOUR BUILDING MOMENT. EXACTLY AND OF COURSE, WE'RE GOING TO BE MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE STORM THERE, IRRIGATION WATER, ETCETERA. FIRE WOULD HAVE TO APPROVE THAT. ALSO EXACTLY PART DEPARTMENT TO ALLOW FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES TO GET IN AND OUT OF THEM. YEAH, AND BASED ON THE ON THE LAYER THAT WE HAVE, WE SHOULD HAVE ENOUGH ACCESS. WE'RE TRYING TO PUT A FIRE HYDRANT REQUIRED FROM IT. THERE'S A SUFFICIENT LINE RUNNING RUNNING FROM WHICH IS, UM BELLA FLOOR STREET. THERE'S A EXISTING WATER LINE THAT WE CAN USE TO TAP IN. SO IN ORDER SO WE CAN EXTEND A FIRE HYDRANT. IF THERE'S SOME SO LOUISE, THIS PRELIMINARY CLASSIC THAT THEY SENT US WITH WITH MULTIPLE UNITS IS NOT GOING TO BE THE WAY IT'S GONNA BE. IT'S ONE UNIT. IT JUST SAYS PARKING LOT ON IT'S WORTH. IT'S JUST ONE UNIT SO BETWEEN THE ONE UNIT, THERE'S GOING TO BE MULTIPLE APARTMENTS JUST COMBINED TOGETHER. ONE SINGLE TRIP ALL IN ONE BUILDING AS OPPOSED TO THE LIGHTS, OKAY? I FORGOT. I'M LOOKING AT THE WRONG THING. I'M SORRY WITH ONE LONG OR FIVE WALK AND SO ON. THERE'S GOING TO BE AS WELL FOR UM, LET'S DR ALONGSIDE THOSE THOSE THAT BUILDING TO GET TO THAT BACK PARKING LOT. WHAT? WHAT WAS AFRICAN? IT'S NOT TOO NARROW, TOO. IT LOOKS VERY NARROW. BUT IN THAT DRAWING. NO WE ACTUALLY HAVE THE MINIMUM THAT WE SEE FROM OTHER DEVELOPMENTS WERE REFERRED 26 FT FOR A DRIVE. I'LL FOR FIRE HEIGHT, PART DEPARTMENT TO GO THROUGH AND WE ACTUALLY HAVE 28. SO WE SHOULD BE. WE SHOULD BE GOOD AT AS FAR AS THAT PARKING SIZES AS WELL. MINIMUM. IT'S 18. UM BY BY 9 FT, SO WE SHOULD BE OKAY ON THAT ONE ACCOMMODATING AND, OF COURSE, BASED ON THE DETENTION OF THE
[00:15:05]
REQUIRED PARKING LOT. WHATEVER WEAKNESS SPACE WE HAVE, WE'RE GONNA START SHOWING THE MOUNTAIN OF BUILDING. OH, I SAW AREA THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE DOING. THANK YOU HAVE ALREADY SHOWED THIS TO STAFF. YES. WE ALREADY SPOKE ABOUT IT. ON THE PROBLEM OF IDEAS. THANK YOU HAVE A QUESTION THINKING OF PUTTING UP FENCE TO DIVIDE YOUR PROPERTIES FROM THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AREA. I MEAN, IT CAN BE CONSIDERED. I KNOW THERE'S A REQUIREMENT FOR FENCING ALONG THE PERIMETER PRIVATE. UNITS AND ALL THAT. HE CAN BE ALSO CONSIDERED. I DON'T SEE WHY NOT. REQUIREMENTS CONDITIONS RIGHT. WE WANTED TO. ABOUT THAT. UNFORTUNATELY, THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PUT ONE IN OKAY? OKAY? THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE TO BE HONEST, WAS MAKING THE COMMENTS. WE'RE CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING COMMISSION. I'VE GOT A QUESTION TO THE STAFF. THE ENGINEERS WILL HAVE TO COME BACK FOR A VERY WHAT IF THEY DON'T GET THAT VARIANCE? IF THEY DO NOT GET THE VARIANTS, THEN I MEAN, TECHNICALLY, THEY WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO DO MULTI FAMILY WITHIN THE AREA, BUT IT'S ALREADY BEEN REESE ZONE. THE INTENT IS THAT IT? THEY WERE TO PURCHASE YOU KNOW MORE PROPERTY THAN TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS, THEN THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO MEET IT. A LITTLE BIT ATLANTIC. YES. AND THEN IT WOULD STAY MORE BY FAMILY. IT JUST DOESN'T KNOW YOU CAN'T PUT CONDITIONS ON ZONING REQUEST. IF THIS WERE A VARIANCE, IT WOULD BE DIFFERENT.IS THAT THE ONLY AGAINST FROM THE PUBLIC THAT WE HAVE TO MY UNDERSTANDING. YES SIR. WE UM WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY COMMENTS IN FAVOR AGAINST THIS REQUEST. WE DID HAVE RESIDENTS SPEAK TO ONE OF OUR PLANNERS COME IN. SHE WASN'T GONNA BE ABLE TO MAKE THE MEETING. BUT SHE JUST WANTED TO MAKE IT UP AGAINST IT. YES, BUT I DON'T BELIEVE SHE DROPPED OFF THE PAPER, I GUESS. CAN YOU COME TO THE BUCKINGHAM AND ARE YOU ROLANDO TORRES, MAN? WAS THAT YOUR LIFE? SO YOU'RE THE SECOND LINE. IF YOU GO IF YOU GO BACK ON, IT SHOWS THE PLAN. YOU'LL SEE THE THREE LOCKS. AND SO THE FIRST LOT IT LOOKS LIKE TO ME IS WELL ON THE BORDER. YES THAT'S AND THEN THE NEXT TO LOTS AFTER THAT, JAVIER SANCHEZ, THAT WAS MY FATHER, WHO JUST RECENTLY PASSED. SO UM THE LAND WENT TO BOTH ME AND MY MOTHER. WOULD YOU BE? I MEAN, AMENABLE FOR THEM, PUTTING A SOLID BUFFER PRIVACY THING AND YOU DON'T HAVE TO SEE THEM. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT 10 FT . IF I MEAN IF IT WORKS, I MEAN, IF YOU WERE TO, ACTUALLY IT'S NOT FOR US TO MAKE THOSE DECISIONS EITHER. WE'RE DOING ON A ZONING. REQUESTED THIS POINT IN TIME, BUT THAT WOULD HAVE NO LOSE ANSWERS ON IT. BUT MY AUNT DID SUBMIT PAPERWORK TO THE PLANNER BECAUSE SHE LET ME KNOW. UM I HAVE THE PICTURE OF HER CONTENTION BECAUSE SHE JUST HAD SURGERY YESTERDAY. IT WASN'T ABLE TO MAKE THE MEETING TODAY. SO IT WAS SUBMITTED. SHE ACTUALLY CAME AND SUBMITTED IT, SO I DON'T KNOW HOW IT'S NOT HERE. OKAY? NO PROBLEM NEEDS TO MAKE A DECISION AT THIS POINT IN TIME ON IT SO WE CAN MOVE FORWARD ON IT IF WE CAN.
ALRIGHT. ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU, MR THE QUESTION. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO. THAT'S RECOMMENDATIONS. MOTION. FOR TO NOT GOING STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO YOUR SECOND. NO, THANKS. THE SECOND. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION. ALL THOSE GRADUATE HIM. THOSE. SAME ONE POST FOR FOUR. RIGHT.
THANK YOU. MOTION CARRIES. ITEM B. THIS IS AGAIN OPEN FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS TO CONSIDER THE
[B.]
[]
REZONING REQUEST FROM AGRICULTURAL AND OPEN A SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 41. 5 EAST LOCK THIS DRIVE. YES, SIR. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EAST LONDON'S DRIVE[00:20:03]
APPROXIMATELY 200 FT NORTH OF LITTLE SIMPLE STREET. THIS AREA IS CURRENTLY DONE. AGRICULTURE.IT WAS PART OF AN ANNEXATION THAT WAS DONE BACK IN. MARCH OF 2015. RIGHT NOW, THIS AREA IS ON AGRICULTURAL. IT'S ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FOR THE STATE REQUIREMENTS. WE DO HAVE TO BRING IN AS THE LOWEST OWNING GRADE AND OUR SCENARIO WOULD BE AGRICULTURE. THEY'RE WANTING TO BUILD A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOME. IN ORDER FOR THEM TO PROCEED WITH THAT THEY DON'T NEED TO REQUEST THE RE LONGING FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOME TO BE ABLE TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SETBACKS. I DIDN'T NOTICE TO 42 NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS. WE RECEIVED ONE COMMON IN FAVOR AND THEN AGAINST ITS REQUEST. SOME STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS AS IT IS JASON, SO OTHERS FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES. THEY JUST WANT TO COME INTO COMPLIANCE STRUCTURE BOTH HOME THERE WITHIN THE SETBACK. THANK YOU. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.
ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WAS MAKING COMMENTS. WE'LL CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING COMMISSION EMOTIONAL PROOF MOTION FOR APPROVAL AND FURTHER DISCUSSION. CHERRIES ITEM C AGAIN. WE LOOK
[C. Consider the Rezoning Request from Agriculture and Open Space (AO) District to Industrial, General (IG) District, 50.493 acres of land in the Juan Jose Balli Survey, Abstract Number 29, Hidalgo County, Texas and being a portion of the San Salvador Del Tule Grant, a subdivision record according to the map or plat thereof recoded in Volume 10, pages 58-60, Map Records of Hidalgo County, Texas and further being all of that certain called 9.65 acres of land conveyed to the City of Edinburg, as described in Document Number 1997-575056, Official Records of Hidalgo County, Texas and the remainder of that certain called 34.46 acres of land conveyed to the City of Edinburg, as described in Document Number 1997-575057, Official Records of Hidalgo County, Texas, and a portion of F.M. Highway 490 right of way, being located at 17000 North I-69C, As Requested By Jose “Eddie” Velarde on behalf of the City of Edinburg]
AT THE PUBLIC SESSION. THIS IS CONSIDERED A REASONABLE REQUEST FROM AGRICULTURAL AND OPEN DISTRICT. INDUSTRIAL GENERAL DISTRICT 50.493 ACRES OF LAND IN THE WHAT WAS SAID BY SURVEY ABSTRACT NUMBER 2019 COUNTY. BEING A PORTION OF THE SON SALVADOR REGRET SUBDIVISION RECORD ACCORDING TO THE MAP, OR PLAN RECORDED AND VOLUME 10 PAGE 48 TO 60 RECORDS OF REDONDO COUNTY, TEXAS, AND FURTHER BEING ALL OF THAT CERTAIN CALLED 9.65 ACRES OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF EDINBURGH, AS DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT 1997. 575056 EFFICIENT WORKERS, EVERYTHING COUNTY, TEXAS AND THE REMAINDER. OF THAT CERTAIN CALL 34.46 ACRES OF LAND CONVEYORS, DESCRIBING DOCUMENT. 199757505. OFFICIAL RECORDS THAT WITHOUT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND PORTION FORM OF MARKET HIGHWAY FOR NATIVE RIGHT AWAY BEING LOCATED AT 17. 1000 NORTH 69 C. SORRY ABOUT THAT.YES SIR. SO THIS PROPERTY IS ACTUALLY BELONGS TO THE CITY OF IT WAS ACTUALLY LOCATED OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS. WE RECENTLY AND ACCIDENT MADE IT OFFICIALLY PART OF THE CITY LIMITS ON OCTOBER 2ND 2023 BY THE CITY COUNCIL HAS ADOPTED BY ORDNANCE. AGAIN NORMALLY, WHEN WE BRING PROPERTY INTO THE CITY, WE HAVE TO CONFER THOSE GRADES. AGRICULTURE. SO IN THIS SCENARIO, THIS IS ACTUALLY AN EXTENSION OF OUR EDINBURGH AIRPORT. SO IN ORDER FOR THEM TO BE IN COMPLIANCE, THEY WOULD HAVE TO ACTUALLY ZONED TO INDUSTRIAL TO ALLOW FOR THE HIGHEST GRADE OF INTENSE ZONING TO MATCH WHAT IS ALREADY DONE. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES ARE OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS ARE READING THIS BOOK AIRPORT IS ACTUALLY LOCATED TO THE SOUTH. THIS IS ACTUALLY THIS PROPERTY AND THE NEXT ITEM ARE ACTUALLY TOGETHER. THEY'RE JUST TWO SEPARATE TRACKS. BUT YES, THEY ARE WANTING TO REZONE TO INDUSTRIAL FEMALE BUT MODIFICATIONS. WE DIDN'T RECEIVE ANY COMMENTS IN FAVOR AGAIN STUFF. AND ITS EXTENSION OF THE AIRPORT LIKE THE RUNAWAY. ACTUALLY IT'S AN EXTENSION OF THE AIRPORT AS FAR AS MORE THEIR SPACE. YOU SHOULD. IT WASN'T REAL QUICK. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ANYONE WE SHOULD MAKE ANY COMMENTS. STEP UP TO THE PODIUM. CLOSE PUBLIC PERIOD COMMISSION APPROVED THE MOTION. THANK YOU, SECRETARY APPROVAL FURTHER DISCUSSION. SORRY
[D. Consider the Rezoning Request from Agriculture and Open Space (AO) District to Industrial, General (IG) District, 600.885 acres of land being a part or portion of the San Salvador Del Tule Grant, Juan Jose Balli Survey, Abstract No. 290, Abstract Information 2, located at 15600 North I-69C, As Requested By Jose “Eddie” Velarde on behalf of the City of Edinburg]
EVERY QUESTION. AGRICULTURAL PAYS DISTRICT OF INDUSTRIAL GENERAL DISTRICT 600.88 ACRES OF LAND BEING A PART OF IT OR PORTION OF SAN SALVADOR. TULLEY GRANT ONE WHO'S A SURVEY ABSTRACT TO 90 ABSTRACT INFORMATION TO LOOK AT IT. 15,600 NORTH BY 69. YES, SIR.SO, UM, AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, THIS IS ACTUALLY THE SECOND PORTION OF THE PROPERTY THAT WAS WRITTEN AND. EDINBURGH. WE DID NOTIFY THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTS DID NOT RECEIVE ANY CONCERNS. ON IN FAVOR, OR EVEN AGAINST THIS AGAIN. IT IS AN EXTENSION OF WRITING BURG AIRPORT. THEY ARE GOING TO GO TO INDUSTRIAL JUST TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE SURROUNDING USES. STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS HOUSE. THIS IS A PUBLIC TURN ANYONE WISH TO MAKE ANY COMMENTS. CLOSE PUBLIC COMMISSION THROUGH MOTION. IMPROVED ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION.
[9. SUBDIVISION (VARIANCES)]
[A. Consider Variance Requests to the City's Unified Development Code: 1) Section 5.203-1 Right-of-Way Widths & Paving Width and 2) Section 5.209 Sidewalks, for RG Estates Phase IV Subdivision, being a 6.00 acre tract of land out of Lot 10, Block 23, Santa Cruz Gardens No. 2, located at 4217 Benito A Ramirez Road, As Requested By Quintanilla Headley & Associates]
LOOSEN YOUR HANDS AT THE SAME TIME MOTION CARRIES UNDER VARIANCES ITEM A. THIS IS CONSIDERED VARIOUS REQUESTED THE CITY'S UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 5.23. ONE RIGHT AWAY[00:25:05]
WITH AND DEALING WITH. SECTION 25.209 AND BEING A SIX ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF LIKE 10 BLOCKS 23 SOMETHING WHOSE GARDEN NUMBER TWO LOCATED AT 42 17. FROM ISRAEL. UH, ADAM ELIZONDO FOR THE RECORD. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BENITO RAMIREZ ROAD IN NORTH SISTER CHAVEZ ROOM. IN THE CITIES, E. T. J. IT'S A SIX ACRE TRACK. IT'S A PROPOSED FOR THREE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES. UM THEY'RE AVERAGING 1.43 ACRES EACH. ANTHONY HEADLEY AND ASSOCIATES ON BEHALF OF THE DEVELOPERS OR COSTING TWO VARIANCES TO THE CITY'S CREDIBLE . THE FIRST OF THE VARIANCES IS TO SECTION 5.203 DASH ONE RIGHT AWAY AND PAVING WITH THE REAL GRAND VALLEY METROPOLITAN ORGANIZATION CLASSIFIES BENITO RAMIREZ AS A, UH, COLLECTOR. WHICH IS AN 80 FT, UM RIGHT AWAY. THE REQUEST IS NOT TO NOT DEDICATE THE PROPERTY BUT TO NOT HAVE TO PAVE IT. THAT'S THE FIRST REQUEST. THE ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE PAVING OF THE WIDENING OF THE ROAD IN THAT AREA WOULD BE 26,657. THE WHICH IS SIDEWALKS. AND THIS REQUEST IS THE SAME AND THAT THEY WERE WILLING TO DEDICATE THE RIGHT AWAY WHERE THE SIDEWALK WOULD BE, HOWEVER, THEY DO NOT WISH TO CONSTRUCT THE SIDEWALK. THE COST OF THE CONSTRUCTION IS APPROXIMATELY $7500. MHM THE COMBINED COST OF THE TWO VARIANCES IS APPROXIMATELY 34,157. THE STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL, BOTH VARIANCES. SINCE THE FRONT OF JUST 300 FT. AND EVENTUALLY THE WHITENING OF THAT AREA. WOW, WELCOME. UM IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE NEAREST CITY LIMIT LINE IS 2.5 MILES AWAY. UM AND THAT'S STRAIGHT LINE DISTANCE. IT'S 25.5. SIGNIFICANT. AND STRAIGHT LINE DISTANCE IS CLOSER TO 1.3. THE ENGINEERS HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS MR. THANK YOU FOR PERMISSION. THERE IS THERE. IS THERE ANY OTHER SIDEWALKS OR ANY OTHER PROPOSED WIDENING OR ANYTHING ELSE OUT THERE THAT HAS BEEN DONE. RECENTLY THERE'S SOME DEDICATION THAT'S HAPPENED. MORE DEDICATION, ACTUAL WIDENING, USUALLY, UM IT REQUIRES QUITE A BIT OF FRONTAGE FOR US, TOO. ACTUALLY WIDEN MOST OF THE PEOPLE IN THIS AREA AND THE BEST GROWING, WHICH IS USEFUL, SO THAT WHEN WE HAVE A WHOLE BUNCH OF IT AT THE SAME TIME, WE CAN GET IT DONE. THEM WITH ONE CONTRACT THE SAME TIME IT SAVES A LOT OF MONEY, AS OPPOSED TO DOING SMALL SEGMENTS , BUT I KNOW THAT THERE'S NOT VERY MUCH IMPROVEMENTS IN THIS AREA REGARDING THE WIDENING OR SIDEWALKS. HAVE YOU HAD ANY CONVERSATIONS WITH THE WITH THE ENGINEER BELT? YES SO WE HAVE OUR MONTHLY SUBDIVISION REVIEW WITHIN THE STAFF. AND THEN A WEEK LATER, WE INVITE THE ENGINEERS TO COME AND DISCUSS THESE THINGS. SOME OF THE ARGUMENTS MADE WITH THREE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. IN THE COST FOR THREE SINGLE FAMILIES IS SIGNIFICANT. WHICH IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE, BUT AGAIN, THE STAFF CAN'T MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON FINANCIAL BURDEN. GOD I GOTTA BE HONEST SUBDIVISION WHERE USUALLY SEEING 50. LOTS OF 100 LOTS 200 LOTS. YOU COULD SPREAD THAT COST OF A SIDEWALK OR OVER ON FOUR LOTS. IT'S. IT APPEARS TO BE FOUR. HOWEVER THIS FOURTH PORTION IS ACTUALLY WIDENING. IT'S GOING TO BE A DEDICATION TO HE LOT SO IT'S REALLY ONLY THREE LOTS. CORRECT SO WOULD THE MEDICATIONS PROVIDE SERVICE TO THE CITY OF SAYING THAT THAT WOULD BE THERE AND THE CITY WILL BE ABLE TO AT ONE POINT NECESSARILY DO IT. IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING THAT IT IS VERY POSSIBLE? UM IT'S A WIDEN IN THE FUTURE TECHNICALLY WITHOUT THE MONEY. EVENTUALLY WOULD WOULD HAVE TO. YES ACCORDING TO THE RGB MPO, WHICH TAKES INTO CONSIDERATION HOW FAR IT IS FROM THE CITY AND THE LIKELIHOOD OF IT BEING THERE, WHICH IS, YOU KNOW IT CAN BE CLASSIFIED.COLLECTOR AND THEN AFTER A CERTAIN POINT, NOT BE CLASSIFIED , BUT IN THIS AREA IT WAS, ACCORDING TO THE RGB MPO CLASSIFIED AS A COLLECTIVE THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER. I WANT TO
[00:30:05]
MOTION. TO APPROVED THE VARIANCES WITH THE BASIS THAT WE ACTUALLY ESCROW THE MONEY FOR FUTURE WHITING AND SAY WHAT? GO MOTION THAT'S NOT IMPROVED APPROVAL OF YOU'RE PROVING THE VARIOUS YEAH. GET NINE VARIANTS. DENYING VARIANTS WITH ESCROW. THE DEVELOPER HAS THE OPTION TO EITHER BUILD, OR SQL, EITHER ONE. SO HE HAS NO YEAH YOU'RE DENYING THE VARIANCE. THE VARIOUS THAT THE MOTION. 17 THEY'RE NOT VERY REQUEST IS THAT IT? STANDARD DENIAL OF BOTH FRANCES IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE IT'S ACTUALLY THE RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE TO, UM SIDE WITH THE STAMP PRESENTATION RECOMMENDATION. SO I MOTION. TO APPROVE AS BEING RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. YES, SIR. NO, I WANTED TO APPROVE. AGAINST THE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF, OKAY? PROMOTIONAL FOR I. THIS APPROVAL OF RECOMMENDATION FROM SELF GOOD. YES HE UNDERSTANDS THAT.NO, NO GOOD NIGHT. HE WANTS TO DENY THAT I'M I'M I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW. I WANTED TO APPROVE THE VARIANCE. YEAH SO GO AGAINST THE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF, SO I WANT TO DO IT. AS EVERY SECOND GET MOTION AND SECOND SORRY FOR THE CONFUSION. DO I HEAR ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE THERAPIES HAND OPPOSED SAME SIGN. 232 UH. CAN I JUST ASK SOMETHING? SO I GUESS THE VARIANTS THAT WAS APPROVED WAS THEY DON'T HAVE TO PAY ANYTHING. THEY DON'T HAVE TO DEDICATE ANY RIGHT AWAY. IS THAT CORRECT? YOU WANT TO DEDICATE IT REGARDLESS PART OF THE PLANNING PROCESS. IT'S THE IT'S THE VARIANTS FOR NOT HAVING TO EITHER ESCROW OR ACTUALLY IMPROVED THE WIDENING OF THE STREET OR PUT IN THE SIDEWALK, SO NO SIDEWALKS AND NO MONIES FOR STREETS. CORRECT BUT THEY ARE GOING TO DEDICATE THE RIGHT AWAY. YES GOT IT. YEAH LA LA IS THAT IS THAT THAT'S CORRECT LEVEL. OKAY? THANKS FOR BRINGING ALONG WHAT WERE WE ASKING THE AUDIENCE? WHAT WERE YOU ASKING US? OKAY, EVERYBODY UNDERSTOOD? OKAY. ARTIE. I DON'T KNOW. BE
[B. Consider Variance Requests to the City's Unified Development Code: 1) 3.102-1 Single-Family Detached Lot and Building Standards, Side Yard Setbacks and 2) 3.102-1 Single-Family Detached Lot and Building Standards, Lots Widths, for Imperio Trails Subdivision, being a 43.77 acres tract out of Lot 15, Block 1, John Closner Et al. Subdivision, located at 5300 South Raul Longoria Road, As Requested By Rio Delta Engineering]
UNDER NINE BEFORE GRANTS IS CONSIDERED VARIOUS RANSOM REQUEST TO THE CITIES. YOU CAN FIND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 3.102 ICICLE FAMILY DETACHED LOT AND BUILDING STANDARDS, SIDE YARD SETBACKS AND 3.102. AH ONE SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED A LOT AND BUILDING STANDARDS LIKE WIDTHS WERE IMPERIAL. TRAILED SUBDIVISION BEING 43.77 ACRES TRACK OUT OF LIKE 15 BLOCKS ONE JOHN KLAUSNER ADAMS OF DIVISIONS. THAT'S TRUE. ON THE EAST SIDE OF SEPARABLE UNGODLY ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 415 FT SOUTH OF EAST ALBERTA ROAD, AND IT'S IN THE CITY Z T. J IT'S 43.77 ACRE TRACK. IT'S CURRENTLY VACANT. IT'S GOING TO HAVE 205 SINGLE FAMILY PROPERTIES APPROXIMATELY 5000 SQUARE FEET. ON AVERAGE EACH REAL DELTA ON BEHALF OF THE DEVELOPER IS REQUESTING TO VARIANCES TO THE CITY'S UNIFIED THE BUILDING CODE. UM THE FIRST OF WHICH IS THE BLOCK AND BUILDING STANDARDS FOR SIDE YARD SETBACKS. THE REQUIREMENT FOR THESE LOTS IS TO HAVE 6 FT ON EITHER SIDE. AND THE REQUEST IS TO REDUCE THAT TO 3 FT. HOWEVER ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE THEY WANT TO PUT, UM 7 FT, SO IT WOULD MAKE IT SO THAT WHEN YOU'RE FACING THE LOTS ON ONE SIDE ON THE RIGHT ONE FACING WOULD BE THREE. AND ON THE LEFT WOULD BE SEVEN. SO EVERY ONE WOULD HAVE 10 FT OF BUILDING SEPARATION. BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE THE STANDARD FOR EACH 17 ON THE LEFT ME ON THE RIGHT AND SO THEY'RE JUST GOING TO KIND OF ALL BE ON ONE SIDE OF AT LEAST 10 FT OF BUILDING SEPARATION. WHICH IS WHAT WE ALLOW. FOR THE MOST PART. UM ACCORDING TO THE FARM, MARSHALL, OR MINIMUM BUILDING SEPARATION. SO THAT IS THE FIRST REQUEST.THE SECOND REQUEST IS FROM THE SAME UM CHART WHICH IS 3.1 OR 2-1. THIS ISN'T IS IN REGARDS
[00:35:09]
TO, UM A LOT WITH IF YOU HAVE, UM LOOK AT THIS DESIGN PATTERN. THESE SERPENTINE ROADS. HAVE NOT BEEN SOMETHING THAT WE'VE SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED IN OUR UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE.REGARDING SOME OF THE OUTER PORTIONS OF THE OTHER LOTS. WHEN YOU HAVE A PIZZA SLICE. TYPE OF BLOOD. THAT PORTION THAT'S FACING THE ROAD IS THE SKINNY PART. UM SO IN THE ENTRANCE. YOU END UP WITH A SMALL FRONTAGE. SO . THE INTENTION IS FOR US TO ADDRESS THIS. AT LEAST THE BEGINNING. CONVERSATIONS HAVE STARTED SO THAT WE CAN WRITE THIS INTO THE UBC. SO UM, WE WON'T HAVE TO BRING THEM FOR VARIANTS EVERY TIME THAT THERE'S A SERPENTINE PROPERTY, BUT FOR NOW, THAT'S WHAT WE'VE HAD TO DO. UM SOME OF THE LOTS HAVE FRONTAGE AS SMALL AS 20. FT. UM 12 FT. BUT THE MOST FOR THE MOST PART, THE AVERAGE BETWEEN 48 AND 16. SO THERE'S A FEW OF THEM THAT DO HAVE REAL NARROW ENTRANCES. STEP RECOMMENDS APPROVAL FOR BOTH VERY INSISTS.
DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE SERPENTINE ROADS HAVEN'T BEEN ADDRESSED IN THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE. BUT FOR THE MOST PART. THE REMAINDER OF THE LOT. SEEMS VERY EASY TO WORK AROUND THE URBAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN. THANK YOU. COMMISSION. YOU CAN HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. AND IF WE'RE GETTING THE RIGHT AMOUNT OF DISTANCE BETWEEN HOMES, 10 FT. STILL REQUIRES A VARIANCE. YES BECAUSE THIS IS THE, UM A SEPARATE REQUIREMENT. THAT'S ACTUALLY FORM FIRE CODE, AND THIS IS ARE THE PLANNING PORTION UM SO. THEY WORK IN CONJUNCTION YES, BUT SETBACKS ARE MORE, UH, A MEASURE THAT'S A DERIVATIVE OF ZONING. RIGHT, SO PLANNING WE HOPE. WITH WHAT YOU CAN DO WITH THE PROPERTY. SO WE DECIDED THE ZONING AND THEN THE ZONING DICTATES. THE SEVEN HOWEVER, UM FIRE. THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN. ARE WE TAKING BOTH OF THESE TOGETHER? YOU CAN DO IT BY THE WAY. LISTEN, ESPERANZA DEVELOPMENT. JUST LIKE ONE OF MICROBES OR WHAT IS THIS ONE? WHO'S HOLLYWOOD? REAL DEL GOOD AFTERNOON GARCIA WITH REAL ADULT ENGINEERING. THIS IS FOR MR CORKER SAYS HE OWNS IN VERY GOOD REALTY. UH WE'VE DONE SUBDIVISIONS IN ALTERNATE AND WE'RE DOING ANOTHER ONE IN MCALLEN. THIS WOULD BE HIS FIRST STATION, EDINBURGH, BUT IT'S SIMILAR TO WHAT MY GROWTH IS DOING. ACTUALLY ON SOME OF HIS SUBDIVISIONS. HE ALREADY HAS THREE AND SEVEN SETBACK. SEPARATION. THIS IS WITH THE INTENT OF HAVING THE HOUSES WITH THE DRIVEWAYS. KIND OF LIKE PUSHED TO ONE SIDE, RIGHT? PROBABLY THE SEPARATION. IT LOOKS YOU REALLY UNIFORM, RIGHT ? BUT AGAIN WITH THE SERPENTINE ROAD, YOU HAVE THE NARROW ENTRANCES IN THE LAST, BUT IT OPENS UP AND HE MEETS THE REST OF THE SETBACKS AND EVERYTHING AS AN ENGINEER, HAVE YOU GUYS DESIGNED AND BUILT ONE OF THE PEOPLE? AH I'M WORKING ON ONE FOR MY GROWTH ZONE. ROGERS RIGHT NOW WE'RE FINISHING UP FACE TO ACTUALLY, AND IT'S KIND OF LIKE THE SIMILAR DESIGN ON THIS ONE. IT'S ACTUALLY THE SAME. YES RODGERS COPES. YES THE SAME ARCHITECT FROM MINNESOTA THAT DESIGNED LOT LAYOUT OF CODES DESIGNED THIS ONE. SO WE'RE KIND OF LIKE REFINING THE FORMULA WITH EVERY THIS. IS SOMETHING NEW FOR THE VALLEY. I KNOW NORTH, NOT NECESSARILY. ACTUALLY IT'S A LITTLE BIT LESS STREETS BECAUSE HE DOESN'T HAVE A CORNERS. THE CURBS ACTUALLY ALLOWS THE TRAFFIC TO SLOW DOWN WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION. SO IT'S SAFER. UH YOU DEDICATE AND DESIGNATED.
PROCESS CROSSWALKS. AT DIFFERENT AREAS DURING THE INTERSECTION. THIS IS ACTUALLY THE MIDDLE PORTION THAT YOU SEE THERE. IT'S IT ACCOMMODATES MANY THESE A LITTLE BIT BETTER ON THE SERPENTINE AND EVERYTHING TO FLOW AND CONNECT. DIFFERENT LOTS FROM DIFFERENT PART OF THE SUBDIVISION. KIND OF LIKE A SHORTER DISTANCE, SO IT REALLY HAS A LOT OF ADVANTAGES. IT'S JUST THAT IT'S MORE RISKY BECAUSE IF YOU HAVE ONE DEVELOPER AND WHICH WOULD BE THIS CASE, LIKE ESPERANZA LIKE LIKE IN THIS CASE WE ARE DEVELOPING AND HOLLYWOOD'S ALSO BUILDING ALL THE HOUSES, SO IT'S ONLY WHEN YOU HAVE THE SAME BUILDER. THAT IS ACTUALLY AN ADVANTAGE BECAUSE YOU CONTROL THE I GUESS THE SIGHTLINE AND THE HOUSES AND YOU MAKE SURE THAT THE HOUSES ARE GOING TO FIT EVEN BEFORE YOU START SOMETHING LIKE CORRECT FROM THE COLORS TO THE FINISHES. TO THE WAY EVERYTHING SITS. THERE IS ACTUALLY ANOTHER EXHIBIT THAT
[00:40:03]
THAT WE THAT WE SENT TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT THAT SHOWS ALL THOSE SIGHT LINES AND COLORS AND EVERYTHING FITS WITH DRIVEWAYS AND IN UH SO WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION. FROM STAFF APPROVAL OF BOTH VARIANCES. UH IF. ALRIGHT? UM TRAFFIC ENGINEERS ASKED ME IF SHE COULD SAY A WORD TRUTH? SURE. LONGORIA IN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS IN TRAFFIC ENGINEER FOR THE CITY OF EDINBURGH. THERE WAS A QUESTION ON SERPENTINE, SERPENTINE BROADWAY'S THEY DO ACTUALLY CAUSED SEVERAL TRAFFIC ISSUES. YOU CAN SEE THIS IN LOS LAGOS, WHICH IS OUR DRESS LAGOS, WHICH IS ONE OF MICROBES, OTHER PROPERTIES AND ONCE WE START TO REVIEW, UM, THE DEVELOPMENTS THEMSELVES. THEY OFFER POOR SIGHT OF INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCES BECAUSE OF THE WAY THE STREETS ARE CURVED. THE EMU TCP TRAFFIC, UM THE TRAFFIC GUIDEBOOK FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEERS AND ASHTON RECOMMEND THAT STREETS COME AT A 90 DEGREE ANGLE. BECAUSE OF INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCES. THE LACK OF INTERSECTING STREETS DOES NOT ALLOW FOR PROPER. UM STOP CONTROLS. YOU CAN HAVE THE THREE OR FOUR WAY STOP. SO THEN YOU DON'T HAVE SAFE CROSSING TOR PEDESTRIANS. UM THE TRAFFIC UM, INDUSTRY. STRONGLY. ENCOURAGES IS THERE IS NO ACTUAL STOP CONTROL. SO WHEN YOU HAVE THESE SERPENTINE STREETS WITH NO, UM STOP SIGNS OR SIGNALS THERE IS NO SAFE PLACE FOR PEDESTRIANS TO CROSS, SO THEY'LL JUST CROSS WHEREVER AND IT'S AN UNEXPECTED CROSSING, AND IT LEADS TO PEDESTRIAN ACCIDENTS. UM THE OTHER THING IS UM THE I WAY THAT THE DRIVEWAYS ARE ARE SET. AND THE CURVATURE OF THE ROAD DOESN'T ALLOW FOR ON STREET PARKING. AND THAT USUALLY LEADS TO NEIGHBORS BEING UPSET BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE PARKING IN FRONT OF THEIR HOMES AND ALTHOUGH IT DOESN'T SEEM LIKE SOMETHING THAT PEOPLE WOULD BE UPSET ABOUT. IT WAS MY MANY YEARS OF TRAFFIC ENGINEERING. I'VE HAD TWO IMMEDIATE SEVERAL OF THOSE OF THOSE ARGUMENTS. SO SERPENTINE STREETS ARE FROM A TRAFFIC ENGINEERING STANDPOINT, NOT THE BEST THING. FOR PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. I JUST WANTED TO ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU TO RECOMMEND THIS YEAR BY STAFF FOR BOTH VARIANCES DOING YOUR EMOTION OR DO WE WANTED TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE? OKAY SECOND. JUST JUST, UH COMMENT. I THINK UNDER THE SAFETY FUTURE, I THINK THIS IS ONE OF THE ITEMS THAT THIS COMMISSION THE CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE LOOKING AT VERY CLOSELY. AND IF YOU GO. TO ALLOWS SUBDIVISION USING PEOPLE PUTTING UP NOW THE OAS ARE PUTTING UP MIRRORS ON SOME OF THESE CURVES SO THAT THEY CAN SEE TRAFFIC COMING IN. BUT AGAIN, THIS IS A TALKING SOME GREAT TALKING POINTS BEFORE COUNCIL AND THE COMMISSION TO SEE WHAT THE FUTURE OF THE CITY OF EDINBURGH IS, IS REALLY SEPARATE SPEED STREETS OFF. I'LL LOSE YOU FOR EVERYBODY. LEISURE RIGHT HAND POST THEMSELVES. MOTION CARRIES UNDER ITEM. SEE THIS IS CONSIDERED THE FINAL PLAN[10. CONSENT AGENDA]
APPROVAL OF SANTA CRUZ PALM SUBDIVISION BEING A 2.82 ACRES CRACK OF LAND OUT OF LIKE, SIX BLOCKS ONCE AND CRUZ GARDENS UNIT NUMBER THREE SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MATTER OF RECORDED IN VOLUME NINE. PAGE THREE. LOCATED AT 40 16, NOT LITTLE ROADSTER. UM WE DON'T HAVE ANY. COMMENTS ON THESE PLATES. CONSENT AGENDA. I'M SORRY, CAN I AM TOLD YOU APOLOGIZE? UNLESS THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT. I SHOULDN'T HAVE EMOTIONS. I'LL MAKE THE MOST OF THE AGENDA OF ALL THREE. ALRIGHT THANK YOU GUYS AGENDA. APPRECIATE IT.[A. Consider the Preliminary Plat Approval of Owassa Place Subdivision, being a 9.655 acres tract of land out of Lot 15, Block 54, Alamo Land & Sugar Company’s Subdivision, according to the map thereof recorded in Volume 1, pages 24, located at 8101 East Owassa Road, requested by Melden & Hunt Inc.]
[B. Consider the Preliminary Plat Approval of Imperio Trails Subdivision, being a 43.77 acres tract of land out of Lot 15, Block 1, John Closner Et al. Subdivision, located at 5300 South Raul Longoria Road, As Requested By Rio Delta Engineering]
[C. Consider the Final Plat Approval of Santa Cruz Palms Subdivision, being a 12.82 acres tract of land out of Lot 6, Block 1, Santa Cruz Gardens Unit No. 3 Subdivision, according to the map thereof recorded in Volume 9, pages 3, located at 4016 North. Doolittle Road, As Requested By Rio Delta Engineering]
THANK YOU, UM ANY FURTHER. ITEMS. THE JUNGLE WANTED TO NAME NO, I DID NOT HAVE AN ITEM. JUST[11. INFORMATION ONLY A. Attendance Roster]
INFORMATION. UM WE DID TAKE THE AWARDING OF THE BID OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ON OCTOBER.CITY COUNCIL THIS LAST ONE SO IT WAS AWARDED TO CANDY KEYS. THEY WERE ACTUALLY THE ONES THAT DID A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BACK IN THE DAY, AND THEY ALSO ASSISTED US WITH UPDATING ON THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE. RIGHT NOW, UM , THEY HAD SAID THAT THEY WERE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND GET STARTED. SO EXPECT SOME PHONE CALLS. YOU MIGHT GET SOME MEETINGS TOGETHER TO START TALKING ABOUT THE UPDATED, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. WE DO ALREADY HAVE THE EDINBURGH 2040
[00:45:02]
MEETINGS AND THOSE COMMITTEES AS FAR AS THE VISION FOR EDINBURGH AND WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO BE LOOKING AT. SO WE MIGHT BE SEEING YOU MORE OFTEN. THAT WILL BE INCLUDED IN THAT. THANK YOU.RITA LIKE TO MAKE WHAT ONE COMMENT, AND THIS IS THAT? HE HAD A DISCUSSION THIS AFTERNOON WITH THE MAYOR, AND I REGRETFULLY INSANE THAT I'M GOING TO BE STEPPING DOWN AS CHAIRMAN AND MEMBER OF THIS COMMISSION, AND I'D LIKE TO TAKE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO THANK MY COLLEAGUES FOR THEIR SUPPORT. AND FOR THE TREMENDOUS SERVICE THANK YOU TO THE STAFF. REDA JAIME. AH HAVE BEEN. HAD BEEN ELECTED TO A BORDER SEVEN. REPRESENTING OVER 700 FARMERS USED THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY IN 38 DIFFERENT STATES. REGIONALLY ELECTED AS CHAIRPERSON FOR THIS ORGANIZATION. WHICH WE HAVE PURCHASED POWERFUL WHAT? OVER $1.5 BILLION A YEAR ON IT, SO IT'S TAKEN QUITE A BIT OF MY TIME DOING QUITE A BIT OF LOVING AND WASHINGTON AND THE LEGISLATURE'S YOU'RE IN THE STATE OF TEXAS, SO I FEEL THAT I WOULD CHEAT THE CITY OF EDINBURGH AND THIS COMMISSION. OR TO MAKE MEETINGS THAT I SHOULD BE HERE AT ALL TIMES ON IT. SO WITH THAT IN MIND, I BET YOU FOR A WELL AND I SAY THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU, MR CHAIRMAN. I APPRECIATE BEING SPENDING TIME WITH US. IT WAS GREAT HAVING YOU WITH US. THANK YOU. DIFFICULT IS YOUR LIFE YEAH. WE WOULD HAVE KNOWN WOULD HAVE GERMAN ALL THOSE FAVORS RIGHT HIM OPPOSE HIM. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. UH OKAY.
YEAH, OKAY. DON'T YOU THINK IT'S BLOOD? ANY. VEHICLE HAS THE POTENTIAL OF BECOMING A DEADLY WEAPON. DISTRACTED DRIVER ANSWERING THE PHONE OR TEXTING WHILE DRIVING. HELLO HEY, HOW'S IT GOING MAN, AND THE CHANCES OF A FATAL INCIDENT INCREASED
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.